Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Math & English enrichment at SchoolPlus-Online
HoodaMath: games and movies
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

A Sangaku Follow-Up on an Archimedes' Lemma

The following Sangaku problem sports a publication trail:

  X is a point on a chord L of a given circle C, and circles A and B are drawn on opposite sides of L so as to touch L at X and be tangent to C. Prove that the ratio of the radii of A and B is independent of the position of X on L.

The problem has been included in Fukagawa and Pedoe's Japanese Temple Geometry Problems, offered by Crux Mathematicorum, 1987, 194, and appeared in R. Honsberger's collection From Erdös To Kiev with two solutions from the Crux. The first two solutions below, have been adapted from Honsberger's book.


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

Solution 1

This solution is by Dan Sokolowsky, Williamsburg, VA.

Start by drawing PXQ perpendicular to L at X. Since L is a common tangent to A and B, PX and QX are diameters of A and B. If M and N are their points of tangency with C, angles at M and N subtended by PX and QX are right:

  XMP = XNS = 90o.

Extending MX and MP to meet C in R and S, we get a diameter RS (since RS subtends right angles in C.)

Now, the centers U and V of A and C are in line with the point of tangency M, and it is clear that triangles MUX and MVS are isosceles. Since they share a common base angle at M, the base angles at X and S are also equal, and the lines PXQ and RS are parallel. Thus RS is perpendicular to L.

Similarly, extending NX and NQ we'll get a diameter perpendicular to L. Therefore, R lies on NX and S on NQ.

The next step is to extend MR and NS beyond M and N to meet in T. In ΔRST, RN and SM are altitudes, so that X is the orthocenter. TX is then the third altitude and is perpendicular to RS. But L is a line through X perpendicular to RS, which leads us to conclude that T lies on L.

The final step is to consider two pairs of similar triangles (TXP, TWR) and (TXQ, TWS):

  PX/RW = TX/TW = QX/SW,

so that

  PX/QX = RW/SW.

Since the right side here is independent of X, so is the left side. The conclusion follows.

I have only one remark concerning this proof. We may have started with constructing RS, a diameter perpendicular to PXQ. Then PR passes through M (and QS through N) by Lemma 1 from Archimedes' Book of Lemmas. (The situation has been explored elsewhere.)

Solution 2

This solution is by Sam Baethge, San Antonio, TX. It's a straightforward application of a theorem attributed to another famous Greek mathematician.

Let p and d be the horizontal and vertical components of VX. And let a, b and R be the radii of A, B, and C, respectively. By the Pythagorean theorem,

  p2 + (a + d)2 = (R - a)2 and p2 + (b - d)2 = (R - b)2.

These are solved for a and b to get

  a = (R2 - p2 - d2) / 2(R + d), b = (R2 - p2 - d2) / 2(R - d),

from which a/b = (R - d)/(R + d) independent of X.

This unexciting solution proved extremely useful in constructing the diagram and, ultimately, writing the applet illustration.

Solution 3

This simple solution that is due to Michel Cabart employs inversion which I am not sure has been available to the Japanese during the period of seclusion.

Trace the tangents D1 and D2 to circle C in R and S. Now transform the figure by the inversion with center X, and power equal to the power of X relative to C. The latter equals k = XM·XS = XN·XR. In particular this means that M and X are inverse images of each other, and so are N and R.

Circle A is transformed into a straight line parallel to L through the image of M, which is D2. Similarly, B is mapped onto D1.

The inverse of P stays on the perpendicular to L through X, i.e., PQ, but also lies on the image of A, i.e. D2. Hence the distance from X to the image of P is R + d. The distance from P itself to X is of course 2a. Thus 2a·(R + d) = k. Similarly, for the inverse of Q, 2b·(R - d) = k. Taking the ratio, we have the desired a/b = (R - d)/(R + d).

Sangaku

  1. Sangaku: Reflections on the Phenomenon
  2. Critique of My View and a Response
  3. 1 + 27 = 12 + 16 Sangaku
  4. 3-4-5 Triangle by a Kid
  5. 7 = 2 + 5 Sangaku
  6. A 49th Degree Challenge
  7. A Geometric Mean Sangaku
  8. A Hard but Important Sangaku
  9. A Restored Sangaku Problem
  10. A Sangaku: Two Unrelated Circles
  11. A Sangaku by a Teen
  12. A Sangaku Follow-Up on an Archimedes' Lemma
  13. A Sangaku with an Egyptian Attachment
  14. A Sangaku with Many Circles and Some
  15. An Old Japanese Theorem
  16. Archimedes Twins in the Edo Period
  17. Arithmetic Mean Sangaku
  18. Bottema Shatters Japan's Seclusion
  19. Circles and Semicircles in Rectangle
  20. Circles in a Circular Segment
  21. Circles Lined on the Legs of a Right Triangle
  22. Equal Incircles Theorem
  23. Equilateral Triangle, Straight Line and Tangent Circles
  24. Equilateral Triangles and Incircles in a Square
  25. Five Incircles in a Square
  26. Four Hinged Squares
  27. Four Incircles in Equilateral Triangle
  28. Gion Shrine Problem
  29. Harmonic Mean Sangaku
  30. Heron's Problem
  31. In the Wasan Spirit
  32. Incenters in Cyclic Quadrilateral
  33. Japanese Art and Mathematics
  34. Malfatti's Problem
  35. Maximal Properties of the Pythagorean Relation
  36. Neuberg Sangaku
  37. Out of Pentagon Sangaku
  38. Peacock Tail Sangaku
  39. Pentagon Proportions Sangaku
  40. Pythagoras and Vecten Break Japan's Isolation
  41. Radius of a Circle by Paper Folding
  42. Review of Sacred Mathematics
  43. Sangaku à la V. Thebault
  44. Sangaku and The Egyptian Triangle
  45. Sangaku in a Square
  46. Sangaku Iterations, Is it Wasan?
  47. Sangaku with 8 Circles
  48. Sangaku with Three Mixtilinear Circles
  49. Sangaku with Versines
  50. Sangakus with a Mixtilinear Circle
  51. Sequences of Touching Circles
  52. Square and Circle in a Gothic Cupola
  53. Tangent Circles and an Isosceles Triangle
  54. The Squinting Eyes Theorem
  55. Steiner's Sangaku
  56. Three Incircles In a Right Triangle
  57. Three Squares and Two Ellipses
  58. Three Tangent Circles Sangaku
  59. Triangles, Squares and Areas from Temple Geometry
  60. Two Arbelos, Two Chains
  61. Two Circles in an Angle
  62. Two Sangaku with Equal Incircles

References

  1. H. Fukagawa, D. Pedoe, Japanese Temple Geometry Problems, The Charles Babbage Research Center, Winnipeg, 1989, #4.2.4
  2. R. Honsberger, From Erdös To Kiev, MAA, 1996.

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

33061687Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK