| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One of the properties of the arbelos noticed and proved by Archimedes in his Book of Lemmas is that the two small circles inscribed into two pieces of the arbelos cut off by the line perpendicular to the base through the common point of the two small semicircles are equal. The circles have been known as Archimedes' Twin Circles. More than 2200 years after Archimedes, L. Bankoff (1974) has found another circle equal to the twins.
The best way to see the circle is to reflect the arbelos in the common base of its constituent semicircles. Proposition 6 of the Book of Lemmas deals with the circle tangent to all three semicircles. The two points of tangency with the small semicircles together with the point C in the applet form a triangle whose circumcenter has the same radius as Archimedes' twins! For definiteness' sake, let the semicircles have centers O, O1, O2. Following Bankoff's convention, a circle will be denoted by the same letter as its center enclosed in a couple of parentheses. Thus, e.g. the big semicircle is the top part of (O). The twin circles are, say, (W1) and (W2), and the circle due to Proposition 6 is (O3). The circle in question is (W3). To prove this result we shall use the inversion with center A and the power equal to AC·AB. The inversion swaps B and C, and further
Denote the radii of the circles (O), (O1), (O2), (O3),(W1), (W2), (W3), (O'1), (O'3), (W'1), (W'3) as R, R1, R2, R3, We have the following:
Note that in terms of R1 and R2, Archimedes' formula becomes
RemarkAs an aside, the foregoing reminds me of another question. Two brothers that were born virtually at the same time on the same day in the same year to the same parents are not twins. How can this be? References
They were two of a set of triplets or quadraplets or ...
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||