On Bottema's Shoulders II
What Is This About?
A Mathematical Droodle
What if applet does not run? |
|Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Geometry|
Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny
On Bottema's Shoulders
What if applet does not run? |
Consider a configuration of two squares ACBcBa and BCAcAb with a common vertex C. Bottema's theorem claims that the midpoint M of the segment AbBa is independent of C. Professor W. McWorter has observed that the result still holds if the squares are replaced with similar parallelograms so that the angles BaAC and BCAc are equal. The proof is actually the same as that for Bottema's original theorem. One just has to replace the factor i with an arbitrary complex number. The proof can be slightly simplified by placing A at the origin, such that
Let c be a complex number. Define
Ba = cg,
Ac = g + c(b - g), and
Ab = Ac + (b - g).
Then
Ab = b + c(b - g).
For the midpoint M of AbBa, we get
M | = (Ab + Ba)/2 |
= (cg + b + cb - cg)/2, | |
= b(1 + c)/2, |
which is independent of g, i.e. C.
Bottema's Theorem
- Bottema's Theorem
- An Elementary Proof of Bottema's Theorem
- Bottema's Theorem - Proof Without Words
- On Bottema's Shoulders
- On Bottema's Shoulders II
- On Bottema's Shoulders with a Ladder
- Friendly Kiepert's Perspectors
- Bottema Shatters Japan's Seclusion
- Rotations in Disguise
- Four Hinged Squares
- Four Hinged Squares, Solution with Complex Numbers
- Pythagoras' from Bottema's
- A Degenerate Case of Bottema's Configuration
- Properties of Flank Triangles
- Analytic Proof of Bottema's Theorem
- Yet Another Generalization of Bottema's Theorem
- Bottema with a Product of Rotations
- Bottema with Similar Triangles
- Bottema in Three Rotations
- Bottema's Point Sibling
|Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Geometry|
Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny
71946860