Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Learning Math Online
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

Erdös-Mordell Inequality

In 1935, the following problem proposal appeared in the “Advanced Problems” section of the American Mathematical Monthly:

  3740. Proposed by Paul Erdös, The University of Manchester, England.

 

From a point O inside a given triangle ABC the perpendiculars OP, OQ, OR are drawn to its sides. Prove that

  OA + OB + OC ≥ 2(OP + OQ + OR).

A trigonometric solution by L. J. Mordell and D. F. Barrow was published in 1937. The inequality became known as the Erdös-Mordell Inequality or Erdös-Mordell Theorem.

Numerous additional proofs have been published since. The most elementary yet is of the recent vintage and is due to Claudi Alsina and Roger B. Nelsen.

 

In the notations of the above diagram the inequality appears as

  x + y + z ≥ 2(p + q + r).

The proof of the inequality is based on the following

Lemma

For the quantities x, y, z, p, q, r in ΔABC, we have ax ≥ br + cq, by ≥ ar + cp, and cz ≥ aq + bp.

Proof of Lemma

 

For the proof we construct a trapezoid as shown. The diagram makes the first inequality ax ≥ br + cq obvious. The other two are shown similarly.

(That we do have a trapezoid follows from counting the angles at vertex A: they do sum up to 180°.)


The Erdös-Mordell Inequality

If O is a point within a triangle ABC whose distances to the vertices are x, y, and z, then

  x + y + z ≥ 2(p + q + r).

Proof

From the lemma we have ax ≥ br + cq, by ≥ ar + cp, and cz ≥ aq + bp. Adding these three inequalities yields

  x + y + z ≥ (b/a + a/b)r + (c/a + a/c)q + (c/b + b/c)p.

But the arithmetic mean-geometric mean inequality insures that the coefficients of p, q, and r are each at least 2, from which the desired result follows.

Observe that the three inequalities in the lemma are equalities if and only if O is the circumcenter of ΔABC, for in this case the trapezoids become rectangles.

Remark

If the arithmetic mean-geometric mean inequality is applied directly to the identities in Lemma, one obtains another relationship:

  xyz ≥ 8pqr.

Note

In a 1957 paper (D. K. Kazarinoff’s inequality for tetrahedra, Michigan Math. J., 4 (1957), pp 99–104) Nicholas D. Kazarinoff proved an analogue of the Erdös-Mordell inequality for tetrahedra: Let S be a tetrahedron, and P a point not exterior to S. Let the distances from P to the vertices and to the faces be denoted by Ri and ri respectively. The following analogue of the Erdös-Mordell inequality holds for any tetrahedron whose circumcenter is not an exterior point

  ΣRi / Σri > 22.

and 22 is the greatest lower bound.

Reference

  1. Claudi Alsina and Roger B. Nelsen, A Visual Proof of the Erdös-Mordell Inequality, Forum Geometricorum, Volume 7 (2007) 99–102

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

34222389Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK