Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Complex Numbers

  1. Algebraic Structure of Complex Numbers
  2. Division of Complex Numbers
  3. Useful Identities Among Complex Numbers
  4. Useful Inequalities Among Complex Numbers
  5. Trigonometric Form of Complex Numbers
  6. Real and Complex Products of Complex Numbers
  7. Complex Numbers and Geometry
  8. Remarks on the History of Complex Numbers
  9. Complex Numbers: A Dynamic Tool
  10. Cartesian Coordinate System
  11. Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
  12. Complex Number To a Complex Power May Be Real
  13. One Can't Compare Two Complex Numbers
  14. Problems

Useful Identities Among Complex Numbers

The basic properties of complex numbers follow directly from the defintion.

(1) Re(z + w) = Re(z) + Re(w) and Im(z + w) = Im(z) + Im(w).

Indeed

 
z + w= (Re(z) + i·Im(z)) + (Re(w) + i·Im(w))
 = (Re(z) + (Re(w)) + i·(Im(z) + Im(w)),

which is exactly what (1) claims.

The two functions Re(z) and Im(z) are in fact linear:

(2) Re(tz + sw) = tRe(z) + sRe(w),
Im(tz + sw) = tIm(z) + sIm(w),

for any real t and s. In particular,

  Re(z - s) = Re(z) - Re(w),
Im(z - w) = Im(z) - Im(w).

It follows from (2) that the z' is also linear, i.e., for any real t and s, we have

  (tz + sw)' = tz' + sw'.

As every linear function, Re(z), Im(z) and z' are continuous. For example,

 
|z' - w'|= |(z - w)'|
 = |z - w|,

such that if z and w are close, so are z' and w'.

By definition,

  Re(zw) = Re(z)Re(w) - Im(z)Im(w),
Im(zw) = Re(z)Im(w) + Im(z)Re(w).

Also,

(3) (zw)' = z'w'.

Since z' = Re(z) - i·Im(z),

(4) Re(z) = (z + z') / 2 and
Im(z) = (z - z') / 2i.

For any four complex numbers u, v, w, z, the following non-trivial identity can be verified by direct inspection:

(5) (u - v)(w - z) + (u - z)(v - w) = (u - w)(v - z).

By the triangle inequality, and the multiplicative property of the absolute (e.g. (u - v)(w - z) = |u - v|·|w - z|) we obtain

(6) |u - v|·|w - z| + |u - z|·|v - w| ≥ |u - w|·|v - z|.

The equality here is achieved only if (u - v)(w - z) / (u - z)(v - w) is a positive real number. This requirement is equivalent to saying that that (u - v)/(u - z) : (w - v)/(w - z) is a negative real number. It is satisfied iff the four points u, v, w, z (in this order) are cocylic. In the case of equality, we recognize the famous Ptolemy's theorem: if the points U, V, W, Z correspond to complex numbers u, v, w, z,

  UV·WZ + UZ·VW = UV·VZ,

where according to our stipulations, UV, VW, WZ, and UZ are the sides and UV and VZ the diagonals of a convex cyclic quadrilateral UVWZ. We owe the more general assertion (6) to a discovery of L. Euler. However, the inequality (6) expressed in geometric terms

  UV·WZ + UZ·VW ≥ UV·VZ,

is known as Ptolemy's inequality.

Remark

Euler's theorem (6) led (1936) the Romanian mathematician D. Pompeiu to a generalization of van Schooten's theorem, about 300 years after the latter's discovery. If ΔUVZ is equilateral, then for any W, not on the circumcircle of ΔUVZ, there exists a triangle with side lengths UW, VW, ZW. Indeed, (6) implies that

(7) UV·WZ + UZ·VW ≥ UV·VZ,

with the equality only for W on the circumcircle of ΔUVZ. Since the triangle is equilateral, UV = UZ = VZ and, from (7),

  WZ + VW ≥ VZ.

If we assume that, of the three segments WZ, VW, VZ, VZ is the largest, the other two required inequalities (see Euclid I.20 and I.22), VZ + VW ≥ WZ and WZ + VZ ≥ VW, will follow by default.

References

  1. T. Andreescu, D. Andrica, Complex Numbers From A to ... Z, Birkhäuser, 2006
  2. C. W. Dodge, Euclidean Geometry and Transformations, Dover, 2004 (reprint of 1972 edition)
  3. Liang-shin Hahn, Complex Numbers & Geometry, MAA, 1994
  4. E. Landau, Foundations of Analisys, Chelsea Publ, 3rd edition, 1966

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

28713988Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
Math
Posted by Laura
2 messages
06:56 AM, Apr-15-08

Divisibility rules - Jargon buste ...
Posted by Carolyn
2 messages
08:35 AM, Apr-04-08

drawing puzzle
Posted by martin gran
31 messages
06:53 PM, May-09-08

Distance to the horizon
Posted by Monty
3 messages
04:38 PM, May-08-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

Deriving functions based on diffe ...
Posted by ke_45
1 messages
12:47 PM, May-10-08

A typo in
Posted by alexwajn
1 messages
11:36 PM, Apr-19-08