## Cut The Knot!An interactive column using Java applets
by Alex Bogomolny |

# The Parabola

February 2004

Menaechmus (c. 375-325 BC), a pupil of Eudoxus, tutor to Alexander the Great, and a friend of Plato [Smith, p. 92], is credited with the discovery of the *conics*. A more revealing term is *conic sections* on account of their being found as the intersections of circular cones by planes. If the planes pass through the vertex of the cone, the conics are said to be *degenerate*, otherwise they are not. There are three non-degenerate conics: the *ellipse*, the *parabola*, and the *hyperbola*.

The parabola results when the plane is parallel to a generating line of the cone. This is an unbounded curve some of whose properties will be discussed and illustrated below. The plane can be thought of as being hinged on a straight line perpendicular to the axis of the cone. Rotate the plane even a little bit in one direction so that it still cuts only one nappe of the cone, the intersection will become a closed curve - an ellipse; turn it in the other direction, the plane will cut the second nappe while the curve will acquire a second infinite branch. This 2-pieces curve is known as a hyperbola.

Following Pappus (c. 290-350 AD), the common belief is that it was Apollonius of Perga (c, 262-190 BC) who gave the curves their names. However, some question [Salmon, p. 328] the veracity of the attribution since, for example, Archimedes (287-212 BC) - Apollonius' elder - was already using the names.

The term **parabola** comes [Schwartzman, p. 158] from Greek *para* "alongside, nearby, right up to," and *-bola*, from the verb *ballein* "to cast, to throw." Understandably, *parallel* and many of its derivatives start with the same root. The word *parabola* may thus mean "thrown parallel" in accordance with the definition.

The story is interesting, and a short etymological regression won't be entirely out of place. As I. Kant once appropriately (see below) remarked, "... even clever persons occasionally chatter" [Kant, p. 55].

Mathematics is known to heavily borrow its terminology from the common language. Sometimes the process goes in reverse, and the conics serve one such example. As J. Conway has noted years ago in an online discussion,'... it was Aristotle who took over the mathematical words that have now become "hyperbola","ellipse", "parabola" into rhetoric, where they have become "hyperbole", "elliptic speech" or "ellipsis", and "parable"... In rhetoric, "hyperbolic" speech is the kind that goes beyond the facts, "elliptic speech" falls short of them, while a "parable" is a story that exactly fits the facts.' Since parables were originally spoken stories, the Latin verb *parabolare* came to mean "to speak." Via French we also got *parley*, *parlance*, *parlor*, *parliament*, *parole* [Schwartzman, p. 158] and from the Portuguese metathesis offshoot *palabre* the word *palaver* [J. Conway]. (**pa·lav·er** *n*. **1.a**. Idle chatter. **b**. Talk intended to charm or beguile.)

The etymology of the conics is bolstered by the form of the equations that describe the curves. In modern notations, conics are the curves generally given by a second degree equation:

(1)

Ax^{2} + 2Bxy + Cy^{2} + 2Dx + 2Ey + F = 0.

The *discriminant* D = B^{2} - AC of the equation serves to differentiate between various curves: for ellipse, parabola, and hyperbola D is respectively less, equal, and greater than 0. In a special system of coordinates, (1) could be transformed into the *canonical*

(2)

y^{2} = 2px + qx^{2},

which represents an ellipse, a parabola, or a hyperbola depending on whether q is less, equal, or greater than 0. The number p is known as the *focal parameter* for reasons that will be partially explained below. (Note that the word *parameter* has the same Greek origin as *parabola* and signifies an attribute of a mathematical object given either *alongside* other attributes or the one that *exactly* determines the object.)

Further nomenclature is as follows: p/2 is called the *focal distance*, the point *focus*, and the straight line *directrix* of the conic. Ellipse and hyperbola each have two foci and two directrices, whilst parabola has only one of each. (The opinions of course vary. Some say that parabola has two foci as do all other non-degenerate conics, with the second focus being a point at infinity.) The chord through the focus parallel to the directrix is known as the *focal chord*, or *latus rectum*. Latus rectum measures exactly 2p.

In polar coordinates (r, q) centered at a focus [Brannan, Coxeter, Salmon], the conics are given by

(3)

r = p / (1 + e·cos q),

where parameter e - the conic's *eccentricity* - is less, equal, or greater than 1 for the ellipse, parabola, and hyperbola, respectively. (It is thought to be non-negative, although for hyperbola, (3) describes only one of its branches. The second branch is obtained with the plus sign "+" in (3) replaced by "-".)

The focus, directrix and eccentricity combine in the definition of the conics as the *loci* of points: a conic section is the locus of points the ratio of whose distances to a fixed point (focus) and a fixed line (directrix) is a fixed quantity (eccentricity.) Thus, a distinguishing property of parabola is that its points are equidistant from the focus and the directrix. In addition, "... the shape of a conic is determined by its eccentricity. That is, all conics of the same eccentricity are similar, differing from one another merely in size. Since all parabolas have eccentricity 1, all parabolas are similar to one another, differing from one another only in size" [Eves, p. 5]. The similarity of the curves with the same eccentricity follows easily from (3). In such a rare property, parabola is analogous to circle (eccentricity 0) [Gardner].

All this (and more) was known to Apollonius, but two revolutionary discoveries involving conics had to wait until the 17^{th} century. Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) published his three laws of planetary motion in 1609 and 1619. In a major revision of Copernicus' heliocentric theory, Kepler placed the planets on elliptical orbits with the sun at their common focus. In a momentous departure from the Aristotelian theory, Galileo Galilei (1564-1642) has realized that the motion of material objects could be split into independent components, say horizontal and vertical for a projectile. This understanding led him to revising even his own beliefs. As he himself wrote, "... where the senses fail us reason must step in." By 1604 he concluded that projectiles travel along parabolic trajectories. However, the results had not been published until 35 years later.

It can be observed (and of course proven from the focal definition or, as easily, from the canonical or polar equation) that parabola has an *axis of symmetry* which passes through the focus perpendicular to the directrix. The point midway between the focus and the directrix is an extremity of the parabola, known as its *apex*.

The applets below illustrate several purely geometrical properties of the parabola. For entirely idiosyncratic reasons, the parabola has been rotated 90° such that wherever a parabola had to be drawn, I used the equation ^{2}/2p

### Theorem 1

10 May 2015, Created with GeoGebra

Let A lie on a parabola. Then the tangent to the parabola at A makes equal angles with AF and AA' (See, e.g., [Nelsen, p. 44].)

### Proof

By definition, ΔFAA' is isosceles. Let T be the midpoint of FA'. Then the perpendicular bisector AT divides the plane into two parts: one consists of points that are nearer to F than they are to A'; the other consists of points that are nearer to A'. Except for A, all points of the parabola lie in the former half. Indeed, let B be a point on the parabola. Then, since BB' is the shortest segment from B to the directrix,

### Corollary (Parabolic mirror)

10 May 2015, Created with GeoGebra

If a light source is placed at the focus of parabola and the light is reflected from its inner surface, the reflected rays are all parallel to the axis. Radio telescopes are built on a reversed principle. Incoming signals parallel to the axes all pass through the focus [Gardner].

### Corollary (Parabola as Envelope)

The x-axis lies midway between the focus and the directrix. Therefore, the midpoint T of FA' lies on the x-axis. In addition, FT is perpendicular to AT, the tangent at A. In a reversed process, assume a point and a line are given. (We'll take F as a given point and the x-axis as the given line.) Connect the point F to an arbitrary point T on the x-axis and construct a line t perpendicular to FT at T. The family of those straight lines drawn for many points T clearly delineates a parabola. This is the parabola with focus F and the apex on the x-axis. The parabola is said to be the *envelope* of the family of straight lines {t}. The process of obtaining parabola in this manner is known as the *pedal construction* [Yates, p. 50, Gardner]. The x-axis is said to be the *pedal* of the parabola with respect to its focus.

### Corollary (Parabola by paperfolding)

Now imagine a parabola, its focus and directrix drawn on a sheet of paper. Since ΔFAA' is isosceles, and AT is its perpendicular bisector, one may fold the paper along AT. The crease thus obtained, which is none other than AT, is a particular case of a mathematical object known as *paper line*. A paper point is a result of intersection of two paper lines [Martin, Ch. 10]. The whole business of drawing with paper points and lines (there are also paper circles) was introduced in 1893 by T. Sundra Row from India. The first rigorous treatment of paperfolding is attributed to R. C. Yates (1949). The best known axiomatics of paperfolding is due to Humiaki Huzita (1991.)

If, at the outset, the parabola is not given, but only a point and a line, we may produce any number of creases by folding the paper so that the given point falls onto the given line. In time, a parabola will emerge as the envelope of paper lines. Note that it does not matter whether the goal of a particular folding is to place a point on a line, or make the line pass through the point. As a practical matter, if the given line coincides with a paper edge then it is much easier to pursue the latter goal.

### Archimedes triangle

Triangles formed by two tangents to a parabola and the chord connecting the points of tangency have been used by Archimedes in his study of the area of parabolic segments and bear his name. The chord is usually considered the base of the triangle.

### Archimedes' Lemma

Let, in an Archimedes triangle ABS, M be the midpoint of the base. Assume that SM crosses the parabola in O, and let the tangent to the parabola at O crosses the sides of ABS in A_{1} and B_{1}, as shown. Then

The median MS is parallel to the axis of the parabola,

A

_{1}and B_{1}are the midpoints of the sides AS and BS of ΔABS,O is the midpoint of MS.

### Proof

In ΔA'B'F, lines AS and BS serve as perpendicular bisectors of sides A'F and B'F. They intersect at S, so that the perpendicular from S to the third side A'B' is bound to bisect the latter. In trapezoid ABB'A', this line is parallel to the bases AA' and BB' and passes through the midpoint of one side A'B'. It therefore passes through the midpoint M of other side as well.

Triangles AA

_{1}O and BB_{1}O are also Archemedean. So the first part applies: the medians from A_{1}and B_{1}are parallel to the axes of the parabola. But those medians serve as midlines in triangles AOS and BOS.As we just showed A

_{1}B_{1}is a midline in ΔABS. It therefore cuts in half any cevian from S, MS in particular.

### Theorem 2 (Squaring of parabola)

(See [Dörrie, pp. 239-242, Stein, pp.51-62, Gardner].)

The parabola divides the area of an Archimedes triangle in the ratio 2:1. In other words, the area of the parabolic segment AB equals 2/3 of the area of the Archimedes triangle ABS.

### Proof

Let area( ΔABS) = 1. Two thousand years before the invention of Calculus, Archimedes filled the parabolic segment with triangles, whose areas are easily arranged into a geometric series whose sum he already knew.

The first triangle in the series is the "inner triangle" ABO. From Lemma, _{1}B_{1}S) = 1/4. Therefore, _{1}O) + area( ΔBB_{1}O) = 1/4.

AA_{1}O and BB_{1}O are Archimedes triangles with inner triangles (filled triangles in the above applet) inside the parabola segment. The combined area of the filled triangles is half that of their Archimedes progenitors: 1/2·1/4. This is the second term of the progression. The next term comes from four smaller Archimedes triangles with the total area of 1/4 of the two preceding Archimedes triangles (which was 1/4.) The combined area of their inner triangles is therefore 1/2·(1/4)^{2}, etc. Continuing this process, the total, which is the area of the parabola segment, is

1/2 (1 + 1/4 + (1/4)^{2} + ...) = 2/3.

### Theorem 3 (Equal angles and similar triangles)

Assume there are two points A and B on a parabola, with tangents AS and BS meeting in S. Then

S is the circumcenter of ΔA'B'F,

∠FAS = ∠FA'B' = ∠FSB,

∠FBS = ∠FB'A' = ∠FSA,

Triangles BFS, SFA, and B'FA' are similar,

F lies on AB iff S lies on A'B' and, in this case, ∠ASB = 90°.

### Proof

By Theorem 1, SA is the perpendicular bisector of FA'. Therefore,

SA' = SF. Similarly,SB' = SF. An inscribed angle FA'B' and a central angle FSB' subtend the same chord. Hence,

∠FSB = ∠FSB'/2 = ∠FA'B'.

On the other hand, angles FA'B' and SAA' have pairwise perpendicular legs and are thus equal. Since, ∠SAA' = ∠FAS,

∠FA'B' = ∠FAS.

Similar to 2.

Follows from 2-3. Triangles BFS, SFA, and B'FA' have the same orientation and are directly similar. Triangles SA'A and BB'S are also similar the above three, but have a different orientation.

To shorten the expressions, let's introduce a = ∠FAS and b = ∠FBS. If S lies on the directrix,

2(a + b) = 180°. Then∠AFS = (90° - a) + (90° - b) = 90°, and similarly∠BFS = 90°. So AFB is a straight line. The argument is obviously reversible.

### Directrix is the Polar of Focus

Rephrasing #5, we can say that the tangents at the extremities of a chord that passes through focus F, meet on the directrix. This exactly means that the directrix is the *polar* of the focus, while the focus is the *pole* of the directrix with respect to the parabola.

### Lambert's Theorem

(See [Dörrie, pp. 206-208].)

The circumcircle of a triangle formed by three tangents to a parabola, passes through the focus of the parabola.

### Proof

Let the tangent at C intersect tangents AS and BS in points U and V, respectively. Theorem 3, applied twice, gives

∠FSU = ∠FBS = ∠FVU,

which tells us that the quadrilateral SUFV is cyclic.

### x-Axis is simson of the focus

As we saw earlier, x-axis is the pedal curve of the parabola with respect to its focus. In other words, x-axis consists of the feet of the perpendiculars from the focus to the tangents to the parabola. This means that x-axis is the simson of the focus with respect to the circumcircle of any three tangents to the parabola [Honsberger, p. 48].

### Parabola from four tangents

Lambert's theorem suggests a construction of parabola from four tangents. Any three tangents determine a circle that passes through F. Two such circles determine F uniquely. Reflections of F in any two tangents produce two points on the directrix.

### Apollonius' Theorem

Two tangents of a parabola are divided into segments of like proportion by a third and this third is divided in the same proportion by its point of tangency [Dörrie, p. 220]. More accurately,

AU/US = UC/CV = SV/VB.

### Proof

Three triangles AFS, SFB and UFV are similar. Furthermore, their corresponding vertices A, U, S are collinear, as are the vertices S, V, B. Vertex F is shared by all three triangles. The configuration is reminiscent of the Theorem of Directly Similar Figures. Its converse immediately implies that

(4)

AU/US = SV/VB.

The same reasoning applied to tangents BV and CV crossed by the tangent AUS gives

CU/UV = VS/SB,

or which is the same

UV/CU - 1 = SB/VS - 1,

from where

(5)

CV/UC = UV/CU - 1 = SB/VS - 1 = VB/SV.

(4)-(5) prove the theorem.

### Parabola as Envelope II

Assume a parabola with two points A and B and their tangents AS and BS are given. Pick a number n and divide AS and BS into n equal intervals. Label division points on AS with numbers 1, 2, 3, ... counting from S, and mark those on BS counting from B. Connect the points with the same labels. From Apollonius' theorem, the lines will envelope the parabola [Dörrie, pp. 220-222, Wells, p. 171].

If one starts with just two segments AS and BS, the emerging parabola will touch them at points A and B.

### References

- D. A. Brannan et al,
*Geometry*, Cambridge University Press, 2002 - H. S. M. Coxeter,
*Introduction to Geometry*, John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1961 - H. Dörrie,
*100 Great Problems Of Elementary Mathematics*, Dover Publications, NY, 1965 - H. Eves,
*Mathematical Reminiscences*, MAA, 2001 - M. Gardner,
*The Last Recreation*, Copernicus, 1997 - R. Honsberger,
*Episodes in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Euclidean Geometry*, MAA, 1995. - I. Kant,
*Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime*, U. of California Press, Berkeley, 1960 - G. E. Martin,
*Geometric Constructions*, Springer, 1998 - R. Nelsen,
*Proofs Without Words*, MAA, 1993 - G. Salmon,
*Treatise on Conic Sections*, Chelsea Pub, 6e, 1960 - S. Schwartzman,
*The Words of Mathematics*, MAA, 1994 - D. E. Smith,
*History of Mathematics*, v 1, Dover, 1958 - S. Stein,
*Archimedes: What Did He Do Besides Cry Eureka?*, MAA, 1999 - D. Wells,
*Curious and Interesting Geometry*, Penguin Books, 1991 p26,Galileo-catenary - R. C. Yates,
*Curves and Their Properties*, NCTM, 1974 (J. W. Edwards, 1959)

### Conic Sections > Parabola

- The Parabola
- Archimedes Triangle and Squaring of Parabola
- Focal Definition of Parabola
- Focal Properties of Parabola
- Geometric Construction of Roots of Quadratic Equation
- Given Parabola, Find Axis
- Graph and Roots of Quadratic Polynomial
- Greg Markowsky's Problem for Parabola
- Parabola As Envelope of Straight Lines
- Generation of parabola via Apollonius' mesh
- Parabolic Mirror, Theory
- Parabolic Mirror, Illustration
- Three Parabola Tangents
- Three Points on a Parabola
- Two Tangents to Parabola
- Parabolic Sieve of Prime Numbers
- Parabolic Reciprocity
- Parabolas Related to the Orthic Triangle

|Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Geometry|

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

68845035