Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Ask a tutor for free
Learning Math Online

Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

Consecutive Isosceles Decomposition

From one of the solutions to a problem related to the 80-80-20 isosceles triangle, we know that the latter can be decomposed into four isosceles triangles with the bases on the legs of the given triangle.

 

Below, we follow an article by Roza Leikin who considered a generalized problem: which isosceles triangles (defined by, say, their apex angle) possess what she called "Consecutive Isosceles Division"? I'll use the term "Consecutive Isosceles Decomposition", instead, and the same abbreviation, CID.

 

Solution

Reference

  1. R. Leikin, Dividable Triangles — What Are They?, Mathematics Teacher, May 2001, pp. 392–398.

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the original 80-80-20 triangle, we found a 4-triangle decomposition into 20-20-140, 40-40-100, 60-60-60, and 80-80-20 triangles. Note that the base angles form an arithmetic sequence 20, 40, 60, 80 (as are the apex angles.)

 

We shall prove that the same pattern holds for every CID decomposition. Indeed, let Pk-1PkPk+1 and PkPk+1Pk+1 be two adjacent triangles of such a decomposition, one with base Pk-1PkPk+1 = α and the other with the base Pk+1PkPk+2 = β, α > β. The difference between the two angles is α - β, obviously.

 

In the next triangle down the diagram, i.e. ΔPk-2Pk-1Pk, the base Pk-1PkPk-2 is found to be

  Pk-1PkPk-2 = 180° - (180° - 2α - β) = 2α - β,

with the same difference α - β from the previous base angle α.

Assume that an isosceles triangle ABC (AB = AC) with the apex angle of γ admits an n-term CID. The top triangle has an apex angle of (180° - 2γ) so that the next triangle's base angle is

  180° - (180° - 2γ) = 2γ

implying that the difference of the arithmetic sequence of the base angles in the CID is equal γ, the apex angle of ΔABC. The base angle of ΔABC is clearly (180° - γ)/2. For the n-term arithmetic sequence of the base angles we thus have

  γ + (n - 1)·γ = (180° - γ)/2,

from which

  γ = 180° / (2n + 1).

Note that such an angle is half the central angle between two consecutive vertices of a regular (2n+1)-gon.

As we've seen, for γ = 20°, i.e. for the 80-80-20 triangle, 2n + 1 = 9 and n = 4. For n = 1, γ = 60°, as an equilateral triangle is its own 1-term decomposition. For n = 2, γ = 180°/5 = 36° leading to a golden triangle 72-72-36. Next comes the triangle with the non-constructible apex of π/7.

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

34384549Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK