Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Am Math Monthly 71 (1964), 180

Yet Another Proof of the Fundamental
Theorem of Algebra


R. P. Boas, Jr.

The following proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra by contour integration is similar to Ankeny's [1], but is simpler because it uses integration around the unit circle (which is usually the first application of contour integration) instead of integration along the real axis; thus there is no need to discuss the asymptotic behavior of any integrals.

Let P(z) be a nonconstant polynomial; we are to show that P(z) = 0 for some z. We may suppose P(z) real for real z. (Indeed, otherwise let be the polynomial whose coefficients are the conjugates of those of P(z) and consider .) Suppose then that P(z) is real for real z and is never 0; we deduce a contradiction. Since P(z) does not either vanish or change sign for real z, we have

(1)

But this integral is equal to the contour integral
(2)

where Q(z) = znP(z + z-1) is a polynomial. For z 0, Q(z)0; in addition, if an is the leading coefficient in P(z), we have Q(0) = an 0. Since Q(z) is never zero, the integrand in (2) is analytic and hence the integral is zero by Cauchy's theorem, contradicting (1).

Reference

  1. N.C. Ankeny, One more proof of the fundamental theorem of algebra, this Monthly, 54 (1947) 464.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

28695976Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
Math
Posted by Laura
2 messages
06:56 AM, Apr-15-08

Divisibility rules - Jargon buste ...
Posted by Carolyn
2 messages
08:35 AM, Apr-04-08

drawing puzzle
Posted by martin gran
31 messages
06:53 PM, May-09-08

Distance to the horizon
Posted by Monty
3 messages
04:38 PM, May-08-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

Deriving functions based on diffe ...
Posted by ke_45
1 messages
12:47 PM, May-10-08

A typo in
Posted by alexwajn
1 messages
11:36 PM, Apr-19-08