Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Similar Triangles on Sides and Diagonals of a Quadrilateral: What is it about?
A Mathematical Droodle

 

This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet

Discussion

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The applet may suggest the following statement [de Villiers]:

  Given any quadrilateral ABCD, if similar triangles ACP, DCQ, and DBR are constructed on AC, DC, and DB, away from AB so that APC = ASB, where S is the intersection of AD and BC extended, then P, Q, R, S are collinear.

 

This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet

This is a generalization of a statement concerning equilic quadrilaterals; the relaxation being three-fold:

  1. One does not require AD = BC;
  2. One does not require angleBAD + angleCBA = 120°;
  3. The constructed triangles are similar and not necessarily equilateral.

Connect P with Q and Q with R. Construct CE parallel and equal to AD as in the applet. Let CE cuts AB in point F. Since ADCE is a parallelogram, angleCAE = angleDCA and angleCFB = angleA. In ΔCFB we therefore have

  angleECB = 180° - angleA - angleB = angleAPC.

From the similarity of triangles PAC and QDC, we have anglePCA = angleQCD. Therefore

  anglePCA + anglePCD = angleQCD + anglePCD.

which implies that angleDCA = angleQCP, and therefore,

(1) angleCAE = angleQCP.

From the similarity of triangles PAC and QDC we also have PC/AC = QC/DC. But DC = AE since ADCE is a parallelogram, and therefore

(2) PC/AC = QC/AE.

By (1) and (2), triangles AEC and CQP are similar, which implies angleACE = angleCPQ. Since angleAPC = angleECB, we have

  angleACE + angleECB = angleAPC + angleCPQ,

and so angleACB = angleAPQ. By constructing DG parallel and equal to CB, we can prove in a similar manner that angleADB = angleQRB.

A counterclockwise rotation of size anglePAC around A carries C to a point C' on the line through AP, and B to B'. But, since angleACB = angleAPQ, we have angleAC'B' = angleAPQ and, therefore, C'B' is parallel to PQ. Thus PQ is inclined to BC at an angle of size anglePAC. Similarly, from a clockwise rotation around B through angleDBR that takes A to A' and D to D', we have A'D' is parallel to QR, that is, QR is inclined to AD at an angle of -angleDBR.

Since AD and BC are inclined towards each other at an angle of

  180° - angleA - angleB = 180° - anglePAC - angleDBR,

rotating BC through anglePAC and AD through -angleDBR (in appropriate direction), aligns B'C' and A'D' in the same direction, and we therefore have that PQ and QR also line up in the same direction, i.e., P, Q, and R are collinear.

Next construct angleQS1D = angleQCD with S1 on QR. Connect S1 with C. We now prove that angleDS1C = 180° - angleA - angleB and that S1CD and S1DA are straight lines, hence S1 and S coincide.

From the construction we have QDCS1 is a cyclic quadrilateral. Thus angleDS1C = angleDQC = 180°. Also, angleS1CD = anglePQD.

In ΔPQC, we have

  anglePQD = 180° - angleCPQ - angleQCP -angleDQC = angleS1CD.

But

  angleBCD = angleDCA + angleACE + angleECB

and angleDCA = angleQCP, angleACE = angleCPQ and angleECB = angleDQC.

Therefore angleS1CD + angleBCD = 180° and S1CB is a straight line. Similarly we can prove that S1DA is a straight line. Therefore, indeed, S1 and S are one and the same point, namely the intersection of AD and BC. (Note that if S falls on QP, we simply angleQS1C = angleQDC and show in the same manner that S1 and S coincide.)

References

  1. M. de Villiers, The Role of Proof in Investigative, Computer-based Geometry: Some Personal Reflections, in Geometry Turned On, MAA Notes 41, 1997, pp. 15-24

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

28761617Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
Math
Posted by Laura
2 messages
06:56 AM, Apr-15-08

Divisibility rules - Jargon buste ...
Posted by Carolyn
2 messages
08:35 AM, Apr-04-08

drawing puzzle
Posted by martin gran
31 messages
06:53 PM, May-09-08

conway's game of life
Posted by frequency
0 messages
11:52 PM, May-12-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

A Riddle
Posted by idavis1
33 messages
06:59 AM, May-15-08

Josephus Flavius (correction)
Posted by David Turner
1 messages
09:42 AM, May-14-08