Pigeonhole with Disjoint Intervals
Given any nm + 1 intervals, there exist
|Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Up|
Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny
Given any nm + 1 intervals, there exist
By W. McWorter
Let S be the given set of intervals. Let I1,... , Ik be pairwise disjoint intervals in S with k maximum. If
Since k is maximal, every interval in S other than one of the Ii meets an Ij, for some j. Partition the intervals in S into k sets Sj as follows. I belongs to Sj if and only if j is the least integer such that
Since k ≤ n, pigeonhole implies that |Sj| > m, for some j. We claim that any two elements of Sj meet. Suppose A and B in Sj are disjoint. Then, without loss, the interval A precedes B, whence its right endpoint is less than that of B. Also, A is disjoint from all It,
But then the intersection of all the elements of Sj is nonempty. For, every left endpoint of the intervals in Sj is less or equal every right endpoint of the intervals in Sj. Hence the least upper bound U of these left endpoints is less or equal the greatest lower bound L of the right endpoints; and so the intersection of all of the elements of Sj contains the interval
Besides supplying the problem and its proof, Prof. McWorter made the following remark: [This is ...] Not the nicest presentation of the proof. This result was given as a consequence of Dilworth's lemma. According to Claudio Buffara, Dilworth's lemma is equivalent to lots of things including the marriage theorem and Sperner's theorem. Claudio says an excellent presentation of all the equivalences is given in one of Schaum's outlines.
Reference
- V. K. Balakrishnan, Theory and Problems of Combinatorics, Schaum's Outline Series, McGraw-Hill, 1995
|Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Up|
Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny72087610