CTK Exchange
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Reciprocal links
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about |Store| Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "NCLB: Probe of high-stakes tests is latest cheating case"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences Educational Press No Child Left Behind Topic #5
Reading Topic #5
alexbadmin
Charter Member
1436 posts
Feb-04-05, 12:32 PM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"NCLB: Probe of high-stakes tests is latest cheating case"
 
   *************************
From the Christian Science Monitor, Tuesday, January 11, 2005. See
https://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0111/p01s03-ussc.html
*************************
When tests' cheaters are the teachers

Probe of Texas scores on high-stakes tests is the latest case in
series of cheating incidents.

By Kris Axtman

HOUSTON - The "Texas Miracle" that helped launch the nationwide
accountability movement in education is facing new doubts as
allegations surface about possible cheating on test scores. Last week
the Houston Independent School District (HISD) - one of the nation's
largest - announced an investigation of "suspicious" results on 2004
statewide tests.

The wrangling is being closely watched by districts across the
country that are bound by the federal No Child Left Behind Act of
2002, which was modeled in part after the success of Houston schools.

Critics say the possible cheating scandal, and the idea of educators
willing to go to such lengths to raise their schools' scores, is
further proof that high-stakes testing doesn't work. Supporters say
the instances of cheating on such tests are very rare and can be
found in every profession.

Whatever the reality, cheating on standardized tests has been making
the news with increasing frequency. From Boston to Florida to
California, school districts have been investigating claims that
educators are providing students with answers, changing answers after
the test is over, and giving students extra time.

"The No Child Left Behind Act, which has some very solid goals, when
implemented creates an awful lot of trouble in the schools," says
John Fremer, a testing expert with 40 years of experience. While he
says cheating has been around for as long as there have been tests,
the difference in the past few years is that teachers and
administrators are heavily involved, "something that's so alien to
the concept of teaching."

Some recent examples:

* Earlier this month, an Indiana third-grade teacher was suspended
after being accused of tapping students on the shoulder when they
marked wrong answers - the state's third alleged incident in as many
years.

* In September, Mississippi threw out portions of test scores at nine
schools after discovering more than two dozen cases of alleged
cheating. One fifth-grade teacher was fired after allegedly helping
students on the writing portion of the test.

* And in July, nine Arizona school districts invalidated portions of
their test scores after teachers allegedly either read sections of
the test to students or gave students extra time to finish. It was
the state's 21st case of cheating since 2002.

Such troubles, though often isolated incidents, are leading school
districts to take action.

In Ohio, teachers are required to sign a code of ethics and are
warned that if they are caught cheating, their licenses may be
revoked. Kentucky uses six different versions of the exam in one
classroom to cut down on teachers "teaching to the test." In Mesa,
Ariz., the school district hires retired principals to wander among
classrooms, monitoring the tests. And in South Carolina and four
other states, Dr. Fremer's test-security firm has been brought in to
analyze student answer sheets for patterns of cheating.

The problem, say many education experts, is that the tests have been
tied to teachers' job contacts and bonuses.

"Once the outcome of these tests started to matter, was it any
surprise that teachers began to cheat?" asks Steven Levitt, an
economics professor at the University of Chicago. "And I think the
other side is that the risk reward looks fairly good. The chances of
being caught are tiny."

Dr. Levitt analyzed data from Chicago public schools and estimates
that serious cases of teacher or principal cheating occur in about 5
percent of elementary school classrooms. He and a colleague from
Harvard University created an algorithm for detecting teacher
cheating that combines information on unexpected test-score
fluctuations and suspicious patterns of student answers. The Chicago
School District now uses it every year to monitor cheating.

Experts agree that some of what is dubbed cheating may boil down to
confusion over the rules or blurring of ethical line - such as
teachers' use of extremely similar practice exams or leaving study
aids on the wall during testing.

And while there may be a few deliberate cheaters, overall the testing
system is working very well, says Jay Greene, a senior fellow at the
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research in New York. "I liken it to
the income-tax system. Everyone knows someone who has cheated on
their income taxes, but overall the system works pretty much as
designed," he says.

Dr. Greene says the high-stakes tests are doing what they're supposed
to do: making sure kids learn the material. But other experts say
even that is compromised by teachers narrowing their curriculum to
what they know will be on tests.

If an exam asks who the 18th president of the United States was, for
instance, the idea is that the child should know who all the
presidents were, not just the 18th.

"Cheating is not the most fundamental problem. It's the canary in the
coal mine," says Daniel Koretz, who teaches educational measurement
at Harvard University. The coal mine, he says, is the "dumbing down"
of education to get the desired results.

"I think we are in desperate need of accountability in schools, and
tests have to be a part of that," he says. "But it's a mistake to do
it this way, to set arbitrary targets and expect schools to meet
them." Under the No Child Left Behind Act, states have 12 years to
bring children up to academic proficiency or lose federal funding.

Back in Houston, the cheating scandal was uncovered by a Dallas
Morning News analysis, which found surprising gaps in almost 400 of
7,700 Texas public schools - instances of students earning some of
the state's lowest scores in reading, but its highest in math, for
instance, or classes that ranked in the state's top 10 percent in
reading one year, only to sink to the bottom 10 percent in the next.

That's what happened at Wesley Elementary, a Houston school that,
ironically, had been featured on "The Oprah Winfrey Show" and cited
by President Bush for its turnaround in the 1990s.

HISD has acted quickly, creating an Office of Inspector General to
look into the allegations. "We must administer a testing process with
total integrity," said Superintendent Abe Saavedra at a news
conference last week. "And on those few occasions when someone
decides to violate the rules, HISD will take swift and decisive
action to stop it."

But cheating won't stop until the high-stakes testing system is
thrown out, says Linda McSpadden McNeil, an education professor at
Rice University who has studied the issue extensively. She believes
No Child Left Behind is treating education like a business, with
strangers managing schools remotely.

"You could have a great arts program, an unsafe playground, your
ceiling falling in, or national merit scholars," says Dr. McNeil.
"But all they look at is the passing rate of the children in your
building."

The new regulations have had the worst impact on minority schools,
she says, many of which are considered "low performing;" under
pressure to get their scores up, these schools were the first to dump
traditional curriculum and do test prep almost exclusively.

"That is not adding up to any cumulative knowledge," she says. "The
No Child Left Behind legislation is really a very expensive ruse to
keep from having to make the serious investment to make our schools
really good schools. That's the biggest way the system cheats."
*******************************************


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive.
Please do not post there.

|Front page| |Contents|

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK