CTK Exchange
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Reciprocal links
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Products to download and subscription Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "Stumped by differential equation"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange College math Topic #665
Reading Topic #665
Ralph
guest
Jan-19-08, 06:38 PM (EST)
 
"Stumped by differential equation"
 
   I am assigning an economics problem to my undergrads, and I have reduced the problem to a differential equation which I do not know how to solve. I can leave the problem for them at the point where the have to find the diff-eq but I would like to present the solution to the equation to them when we go over the problem set. Can anyone help?

Here is the equation:

Find p(v):

(1-v)(v-2p)-(vp-p^2)/p'=0
p(0)=0

The origin of the problem is in 2 sided bargaining. 2 players with valuations drawn from a uniform distribution make Take it or leave it offers to a seller whose valuation is also uniform on zero one.

Any help would be much appreciated.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Ralph
guest
Jan-20-08, 05:38 PM (EST)
 
1. "RE: Stumped by differential equation"
In response to message #0
 
   Sorry, it's actually

v(v-2p)+(vp-p^2)/p'=0
p(0)=0


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexb
Charter Member
2160 posts
Jan-20-08, 05:49 PM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Stumped by differential equation"
In response to message #1
 
   Well, this does make quite a difference. The latest equation is homogeneous. A substitution

p = vq(v)

leads to a separable equation for the function q. Which, in principle, can be solved by common integration. I have not checked that the resulting integral is simple or expressible in terms of elementary functions.

Also, at an academic institution, there must be available some kind of symbolic integration package: Mathematica, Matlab, or something more specialized. I would check.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
mr-homm
guest
Jan-21-08, 02:23 PM (EST)
 
3. "RE: Stumped by differential equation"
In response to message #1
 
   I looked at this for a while yesterday, and made little progress, eventually concluding that this differential equation was not amenable to any of the tricks in my repertoire. The revised version is, as Alex says, homogeneous. I looked at the form you get if you make the substitution p = vq, and the resulting integrands do simplify in a nice way if you make the further substitution r = q-1/3, which comes from completing the square on the denominator after variable separation. The result is

(1-6r)dr/(r^2-1/9) = dv/v.


The left side integrates easily to one trig term and one reciprocal term. This will give an implicit function for p in terms of v, which would be rather hard (I think) to solve explicitly for p. On the other hand, you can perhaps get v explicitly as a function of p, although the substitution p=qv will make this awkward. In any case, the differential equation is "solved" in the formal sense that the expression relating p and v now contains no derivatives, although extracting the value of p for a given v will still require solving a rather messy algebraic equation. I suspect that plotting the result numerically will be the best approach.

Hope that helps!

Stuart Anderson


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
JJ
guest
Jan-22-08, 07:50 AM (EST)
 
4. "RE: Stumped by differential equation"
In response to message #3
 
   v(v-2p)+(vp-p^2)/p'=0
Since this is an homogeneous ODE and p(0)=0 then p=kv
v(v-2kv)+(v(kv)-(kv)^2)/k=0
(v^2)(2-3k)=0
k=2/3
The solution is : p=2v/3
.
For information, the complete resolution is:
v(v-2p)p'+(v-p)p=0
p=vt
p'=t+vt'
v(v-2vt)(t+vt')+(v-vt)vt=0
(1-2t)(t+vt')+(1-t)t=0
(1-2t)(t')+t(2-3t)/v=0
((2t-1)/(t(3t-2)))t'=-1/v
(1/2)ln(t)+(1/6)ln(3t-2)=-ln(v)+c
(3t-2)(t^3)=C/(v^6)
(3(p/v)-2)(p^3)/(v^3)=C/(v^6)
(3p-2v)(p^3)=C/(v^2)
3(p^4)-2v(p^3)-C/v^2=0
p=p(v) can be obtained by solving this quartic equation (unknown p) using the arduous Ferrari's formulae.
In particular case C=0, the equation reduces to (p^3)(3p-2v)=0 leading to the obvious particular solution p=2v/3.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
mr_homm
Member since May-22-05
Jan-23-08, 00:13 AM (EST)
Click to EMail mr_homm Click to send private message to mr_homm Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: Stumped by differential equation"
In response to message #4
 
   @JJ

I followed the same process as you did, up until the point where you did partial fractions, while I completed the square on the denominator of the integrand. (Also, I forgot a factor of 9 in my integrand, which of course would not affect its integrability.) However, after that, the forms of the integral look quite different, although they must be equivalent. Yours appears to be nicer.

--Stuart Anderson


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive.
Please do not post there.

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK