|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CTK Exchange
alexb
Charter Member
2134 posts |
Nov-15-07, 01:14 AM (EST) |
 |
"triangle of minimal area"
|
Among all triangles circumscribed around a given circle the equilateral one has the smallest area. Proof: With S - area, p - semiperimeter, r - inradius: Heron's formula: S*S = p(p - a)(p - b)(p- c). p(p - a)(p - b)(p- c) <= p{<(p-a) + (p-b) + (p-c)>/3}^3 S^2 <= p(p/3)^3 S <= p^2 / 3sqrt(3) r 3sqrt(3) <= p. It fallows that the equlateral traingle has the smallest perimiter and, from S = pr, the smallest area. Question: a similar statement is probably true for n-gons, with n > 3, so that a regular n-gon has the smallest area among all the n-gons circumscribed around a given circle. |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
alexb
Charter Member
2134 posts |
Nov-15-07, 10:21 AM (EST) |
 |
1. "RE: triangle of minimal area"
In response to message #0
|
It actually simple. Assuming half central angles formed by the segments from the incenter to the vertices are α, β etc., what has to be shown is that tan α + tan β + ... ≥ n·tan(180°/n). But, since tan is concave on (0, π/2), (tan α + tan β + ...)/n ≥ tan{(α + β + ...)/n} and the assertion follows right away. |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
 |
alexb
Charter Member
2134 posts |
Nov-15-07, 02:43 PM (EST) |
 |
2. "RE: triangle of minimal area"
In response to message #1
|
The problem has been formulated in a private correspondence with Prof. McWorter. He noticed an error in the above. Below is my reply: > Don't the assumptions, "sides 2a" and "central angles 2A" assume that the inscribed circle meets the side of length 2a at its midpoint? Yes, of course. Sorry for that. What if we consider pieces a1, a2, b1, b2, ..., and the corresponding angles A1, A2, B1, B2, ... ? Then a1 = tan(A1), a2 = tan(A2), ... 2p = a1 + a2 + b1 + ... = tan(A1) + ... >= 2n tan(/2n) = 2n tan(360/2n) so that p >= n tan(180/n). > And I don't see yet how minimizing the perimeter of the n-gon minimizes its area. This is because, for a circumscribed n-gon with inradius r, S = pr.
|
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
|

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive. Please do not post there.
Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny
|
|