CTK Exchange
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Reciprocal links
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Products to download and subscription Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "triangle of minimal area"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange College math Topic #659
Reading Topic #659
alexbadmin
Charter Member
2134 posts
Nov-15-07, 01:14 AM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"triangle of minimal area"
 
   Among all triangles circumscribed around a given circle the equilateral one has the smallest area.

Proof:

With S - area, p - semiperimeter, r - inradius:

Heron's formula: S*S = p(p - a)(p - b)(p- c).

p(p - a)(p - b)(p- c) <= p{<(p-a) + (p-b) + (p-c)>/3}^3

S^2 <= p(p/3)^3

S <= p^2 / 3sqrt(3)

r 3sqrt(3) <= p.

It fallows that the equlateral traingle has the smallest perimiter and, from S = pr, the smallest area.

Question: a similar statement is probably true for n-gons, with n > 3, so that a regular n-gon has the smallest area among all the n-gons circumscribed around a given circle.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexbadmin
Charter Member
2134 posts
Nov-15-07, 10:21 AM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: triangle of minimal area"
In response to message #0
 
   It actually simple. Assuming half central angles formed by the segments from the incenter to the vertices are α, β etc., what has to be shown is that

tan α + tan β + ... ≥ n·tan(180°/n).

But, since tan is concave on (0, π/2),

(tan α + tan β + ...)/n ≥ tan{(α + β + ...)/n}

and the assertion follows right away.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexbadmin
Charter Member
2134 posts
Nov-15-07, 02:43 PM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: triangle of minimal area"
In response to message #1
 
   The problem has been formulated in a private correspondence with Prof. McWorter. He noticed an error in the above. Below is my reply:

> Don't the assumptions, "sides 2a" and "central angles 2A" assume that the inscribed circle meets the side of length 2a at its midpoint?

Yes, of course. Sorry for that.

What if we consider pieces a1, a2, b1, b2, ..., and the corresponding angles A1, A2, B1, B2, ... ? Then

a1 = tan(A1), a2 = tan(A2), ...

2p = a1 + a2 + b1 + ... = tan(A1) + ... >= 2n tan(/2n) = 2n tan(360/2n) so that

p >= n tan(180/n).

> And I don't see yet how minimizing the perimeter of the n-gon minimizes its area.

This is because, for a circumscribed n-gon with inradius r, S = pr.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive.
Please do not post there.

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK