CTK Exchange
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Reciprocal links
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Products to download and subscription Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "Measure theory Q"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange College math Topic #658
Reading Topic #658
Ralphbne
Member since Nov-9-07
Nov-09-07, 01:00 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Ralphbne Click to send private message to Ralphbne Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Measure theory Q"
 
   I seem to remember from a measure theory class a long time ago something about the following result. My memory may be totally wrong.

Is it true that on the real line with the ordinary lebesgue measure, any set of positive measure is the union of intervals?


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexbadmin
Charter Member
2128 posts
Nov-10-07, 02:46 AM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Measure theory Q"
In response to message #0
 
   >Is it true that on the real line with the ordinary lebesgue
>measure, any set of positive measure is the union of
>intervals?

Regardless of what you mean by "intervals", I do not believe there is such a statement. If you restrict yourself to open intervals, the counterexample is simple:

the union of a set of positive measure between 1/4 and 3/4 with integers.

For closed intervals, a Cantor set of positive measure is a counterexample.

What you might have in mind is the statement of regularity:

A measurable set is a symetric difference of a Borel set and a set of measure 0. See

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regularity_theorem_for_Lebesgue_measure



  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive.
Please do not post there.

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK