CTK Exchange
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Reciprocal links
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Products to download and subscription Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "Rational and Irrational - Continued fractions"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange College math Topic #653
Reading Topic #653
Akash Kumar
Member since Aug-24-07
Oct-19-07, 08:11 AM (EST)
Click to EMail Akash%20Kumar Click to send private message to Akash%20Kumar Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Rational and Irrational - Continued fractions"
 
   Hello everybody,

For quite a long time i did not know how to untie the definition of rational and irrational numbers from base 10.

There was the obvious "p/q is rational for p and q integral q!= 0" definition - which also said numbers otherwise are not - did not illuminate the issues too deeply.

It was then (well a little late) that i came to know about continued fractions and the use they can be put to. They almost magically (beautifully) do the untying work.

However, and this is my question, base 10 still looks like a good way to differentiate rationality and irrationality of numbers. In fact, it looks superior to other bases i have chanced upon in this regard because in base 10 a number is rational if its dotted (decimal i.e something like 2.34) expression either terminates or shows periodicity as it continues indefinitely. A number failing this is irrational.

This definition makes base 10 sound superior because in base 2 we can have a dotted (becimal ???) representation for rational numbers which continues indefinitely and does not show any obvious pattern. 1/3 is a case in point (if i remember correctly)...

So, my question is - is there something really interesting about base 10 or is it just a property many other numbers can show...

(that is, is 10 really a privileged base???)

Einstein - You know, earlier my preference mathematics. Later on i changed it to physics

Pincare: And why is that?

Einstein: I could not tell important facts from non-important ones.

Poincare: Starne that you say so. But now that you mention it, earlier i cherished physics..Now i cherish mathematics.

Einstein: And why is that

Poincare: I could not tell what is true from what is not.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexb
Charter Member
2118 posts
Oct-21-07, 08:14 AM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Rational and Irrational - Continued fractions"
In response to message #0
 
   10 is not a privileged base. In any base, rational numbers are either finite or periodic fraction.

If B is a base with prime factors p, q, r, ... then any fraction whose denominator is a product of powers of p, q, r, ... has a finite expansion in base B. All others are periodic. Those that do not have either finite or periodic expansion are irrational. Being irrational is an intrinsic property of a number independent of a base used in its representation.

For B = 10, the factors are 2 and 5 so that all fractions with denominators in the form 2m5n have finite expansions. No other fraction does. If B is a prime number, then only fraction k/Bn have finite expansions.

This is the reason for B = 12 to be considered superior to B = 10. For B = 10, only denominatros 2 and 5 (below 10) lead to finite expansions. But for B = 12, you have denominators 2, 3, 4, 6, 8. For example,








base 10  base 12
1/2  .6
1/3  .4
1/4  .3
1/6  .2
1/8  .16
1/12  .1


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
sbjnyc
guest
Oct-30-07, 01:59 PM (EST)
 
2. "RE: Rational and Irrational - Continued fractions"
In response to message #1
 
   >This is the reason for B = 12 to be considered superior to B
>= 10. For B = 10, only denominatros 2 and 5 (below 10) lead
>to finite expansions. But for B = 12, you have denominators
>2, 3, 4, 6, 8.

You have to marvel at the ancient sumerians, then, for using B=60.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive.
Please do not post there.

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK