CTK Exchange
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Reciprocal links
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about |Store| Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "groupoid"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange Guest book Topic #338
Reading Topic #338
duffifi
Member since Mar-11-04
Mar-11-04, 10:16 PM (EST)
Click to EMail duffifi Click to send private message to duffifi Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"groupoid"
 
   I am new to this site. As a mathematician, I
was favorably impressed by the glossary, but
I did have a comment on the entry for "groupoid":

https://www.cut-the-knot.org/do_you_know/addition.shtml#groupoid

where it is described as a set with a binary operation
which is not necessarily associative.

Most mathematicians use the term "groupoid" for something
else: a category in which every morphism is invertible.
In rough but more down to earth terms, a groupoid is a
structure with a partially defined multiplication (usually
called "composition" which *is* associative where defined,
and which has an appropriate inversion operation, much like
a group. (See any primer on category theory for more info.)

Most mathematicians call a thingy with a not-necessarily
associative binary operation a "magma". Kind of amorphous-like.

duffifi


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexbadmin
Charter Member
1229 posts
Mar-12-04, 11:16 PM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: groupoid"
In response to message #0
 
   >I am new to this site. As a mathematician, I
>was favorably impressed by the glossary,

Many thanks for the kind words.

>but
>I did have a comment on the entry for "groupoid":
>
>https://www.cut-the-knot.org/do_you_know/addition.shtml#groupoid
>
>where it is described as a set with a binary operation
>which is not necessarily associative.
>
>Most mathematicians use the term "groupoid" for something
>else: a category in which every morphism is invertible.
>In rough but more down to earth terms, a groupoid is a
>structure with a partially defined multiplication (usually
>called "composition" which *is* associative where defined,
>and which has an appropriate inversion operation, much like
>a group. (See any primer on category theory for more info.)
>
>Most mathematicians call a thingy with a not-necessarily
>associative binary operation a "magma". Kind of
>amorphous-like.
>
I believe that at the time I might have had my last chance to dig into algebra at the groupoid level, the word "magma" was not yet appropriated for that purpose.

I'll find a way to mention the fact on the relevant page. Thank you again.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to visit the old Guest book.
Please do not post there.

|Front page| |Contents| |Store|

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

[an error occurred while processing this directive]