|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CTK Exchange
nikolinv
Member since Apr-24-10
|
Apr-30-11, 12:42 PM (EST) |
|
"Is Every Parallelogram Rectangle?"
|
Let a and b denote sides, d1 and d2 denote diagonals of a parallelogram ABCD. Triangle ABC (with sides a, b and d1) and triangle ABD (with sides a, b and d2) have the same area ( same side a and same altitude h). Let denote H(p,q,r) Heron's formula for a triangle with sides p,q,r. From H(a,b,d1) = H(a,b,d2) we conclude d1 = d2. "But this is only possible if ABCD is a rectangle. Is there a paradox, or what?" |
Attachments
https://www.cut-the-knot.org/htdocs/dcforum/User_files/4dbc688a12891ac0.gif
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
|
alexb
Charter Member
2803 posts |
May-03-11, 10:22 PM (EST) |
|
2. "RE: Is Every Parallelogram Rectangle?"
In response to message #1
|
>Check again the Heron Formula in >https://www.cut-the-knot.org/Curriculum/Geometry/HeronsFormula.shtml I have >All it comes out that the Area S equals the semi perimeter s >times r the incircle radius radius >S = rs >Obviously you have two different triangles with different >semi perimeters and different incircle radii even the >product of each pair is equal. There are more than two triangles. I am only interested in that whose incircle is clearly visible. I do not consider either incircles or inradii of any other triangle.
|
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
|
alexb
Charter Member
2803 posts |
May-07-11, 02:53 PM (EST) |
|
3. "RE: Is Every Parallelogram Rectangle?"
In response to message #0
|
>Let a and b denote sides, d1 and d2 denote diagonals of a >parallelogram ABCD. Triangle ABC (with sides a, b and d1) >and triangle ABD (with sides a, b and d2) have the same area >( same side a and same altitude h). Also because both triangles are half the parallelogram > >Let denote H(p,q,r) Heron's formula for a triangle with >sides p,q,r. > >From H(a,b,d1) = H(a,b,d2) we conclude d1 = d2. > >"But this is only possible if ABCD is a rectangle. Is there >a paradox, or what?" > That's actually a good false proof. |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive. Please do not post there.
Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny
|
|