CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Products to download and subscription Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange This and that Topic #940
Reading Topic #940
mr_homm
Member since May-22-05
Sep-06-10, 06:52 AM (EST)
Click to EMail mr_homm Click to send private message to mr_homm Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof"
 
   Looking at the three trapezoids proof has inspired me to try my hand at this. The proof below is very unlikely to be new, but does not seem to be identical to any of the 80+ proofs listed already. It is actually a proof of the law of cosines, which of course includes the Pythagorean Theorem as a special case. It has the pleasant feature of treating all three sides of the triangle equivalently, the Law of Cosines only arising when any one side is singled out.

Let squares be erected on the sides of an arbitrary triangle ABC, and let altitudes be constructed from A, B, C to A', B', C' and extended to A", B", C" respectively. Assume that the triangle has no obtuse angles, so that lines A'A", B'B", and C'C" cut the three squares into rectangles. Since triangle AB'B and AC'C are similar, AB'/AB = AC'/AC, hence by cross multiplication, AB'·AC = AC'·AB, so that the two rectangles touching A have equal areas. This holds for each vertex.

Therefore, (AB)^2 = (AC)^2 - AC·B'C + (BC)^2 - BC·A'C. But B'C is by definition BC·cos(C) and A'C is by definition AC·cos(C), which gives the Law of Cosines immediately. The same relations hold true if signed areas are used for the case of an obtuse angle, hence the Law of Cosines follows in general. Of course, if one angle is right, then one pair of rectangles vanishes, and we immediately obtain the Pythagorean Theorem by decomposition of the largest square.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

  Subject     Author     Message Date     ID  
  RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof alexbadmin Sep-06-10 1
     RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof mr_homm Sep-17-10 2
         RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof alexbadmin Sep-19-10 3
         RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof jmolokach Sep-19-10 4
             RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof mr_homm Sep-19-10 5
                 RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof alexbadmin Sep-19-10 8
             RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof mr_homm Sep-19-10 6
                 RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof alexbadmin Sep-19-10 7

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic
alexbadmin
Charter Member
2607 posts
Sep-06-10, 06:55 AM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof"
In response to message #0
 
   Stuart, thank you.

This is definitely not knew, but I never saw a historic attribution. We have a thread here

https://www.cut-the-knot.org/htdocs/dcforum/DCForumID11/90.shtml


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
mr_homm
Member since May-22-05
Sep-17-10, 09:55 PM (EST)
Click to EMail mr_homm Click to send private message to mr_homm Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof"
In response to message #1
 
   Here's another one:

Inscribed "Star of David" proof of the Pythagorean Theorem:

Let a pair of mirror congruent right triangles ABC and DEF be inscribed in a circle with diameters AB and DE, so that DE is perpendicular to BC. (By symmetry, AB is perpendicular to EF.) Then DE bisects BC and its major arc, and likewise AB bisects EF and its major arc.

Then by the Broken Chord Theorem, EF cuts AB into parts (AB + AC)/2 and (AB - AC)/2, and by the Intersecting Chords Theorem, (AB + AC)/2 * (AB - AC)/2 = (EF/2) * (EF/2), which is equal to ( BC/2) * (BC/2). Therefore, (AB)^2 - (AC)^2 = (BC)^2, which is the Pythagorean Theorem.

--Stuart Anderson


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexbadmin
Charter Member
2607 posts
Sep-19-10, 12:54 PM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
3. "RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof"
In response to message #2
 
   Thank you. I think this is a distinctly worthy proof. It's going to be #88. Much simpler than #86: https://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/BrokenChordPythagoras.shtml


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
jmolokach
Member since Aug-17-10
Sep-19-10, 03:38 PM (EST)
Click to EMail jmolokach Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof"
In response to message #2
 
   It is rather humbling to know that the three trapezoids "inspired" this. I have never seen anything like this, and it is quite elegant! Congratulations!

Success is getting up one more
time than you fall down...


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
mr_homm
Member since May-22-05
Sep-19-10, 07:16 PM (EST)
Click to EMail mr_homm Click to send private message to mr_homm Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
5. "RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof"
In response to message #4
 
   Well, I'm very happy that you both liked it! Upon reviewing the list of Pythagorean proofs, mine seems to be very similar to #79, but using the Broken Chord theorem instead of the dashed bisector line GI to establish the basic relation. I set out only to use the Broken Chord and Intersecting Chord theorems together; the nicely symmetrical diagram was just a bonus.

--Stuart Anderson


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexbadmin
Charter Member
2607 posts
Sep-19-10, 07:48 PM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
8. "RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof"
In response to message #5
 
   >... mine seems to be very
>similar to #79, but using the Broken Chord theorem instead
>of the dashed bisector line GI to establish the basic
>relation.

Thank you for the remark. I forgot about #79. Had to add a remark at the end of #88.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
mr_homm
Member since May-22-05
Sep-19-10, 07:16 PM (EST)
Click to EMail mr_homm Click to send private message to mr_homm Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
6. "RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof"
In response to message #4
 
   Just noticed that the page says "Start of David" instead of "Star of David" ...

Also, in perusing the list of proofs, I see that #23 refers to #7 as using Heron's formula, but this does not seem to be the case. Is there a typo in the number reference perhaps?

--Stuart Anderson


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexbadmin
Charter Member
2607 posts
Sep-19-10, 07:35 PM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
7. "RE: Yet another Pythagorean Theorem proof"
In response to message #6
 
   Thank you for both.

Heron's formula is used in the applet that illustrates the proof, not the proof itself. I hope that the present wording makes this clear.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive.
Please do not post there.

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK