CTK Exchange
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Reciprocal links
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Products to download and subscription Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "People's thoughts on my means of relating sets of numbers"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange This and that Topic #805
Reading Topic #805
JLSnell
Member since Feb-1-08
Feb-01-08, 05:01 PM (EST)
Click to EMail JLSnell Click to send private message to JLSnell Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"People's thoughts on my means of relating sets of numbers"
 
   Hello, recently I finished working on this means of relating points. As I initially perceived it'such a means could relate points between dimensions, however some people have suggested that my expression of non-integer dimensions is not consistent with the accepted view. So just understand it as converting from 1 dimension to 3 dimensions is just converting from 1 number to a set of 3 numbers, but converting from 1 dimension to 2.5 dimensions is converting from 1 number to a set of 3 numbers but in a different fashion than when converting to 3 dimensions (or to 2.6 or 2.84, etc.) So keep that in mind.

I was hoping to share what I have done with some people and somebody directed me here. I was wondering mainly if what I have done is interesting, relevant, or useful. I would explain it here, but the file I wrote up pretty much explains it all in it's brief introduction.

Here's the file, sorry you have to download it this way, but it was too big to upload normally (it's a RAR file):
https://www.megaupload.com/?d=LMXYDJOB

So, everybody is welcome to when they get a chance look at what I've done which is under the under IDCP1F.pdf and IDCP2F.pdf (IDC Part 1 and 2) and share your thoughts. It's in pdf format, and despite it having two parts it isn't that long, takes like 10 or so minutes to read. If there are people who are interested I have other files regarding it that I can share.

PS: After reading it a bunch of times I've noticed 1 or 2 typos, they aren't big and shouldn't complicate the reading or understanding of it. (The typos are NOT in the equations, which is the important part)


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive.
Please do not post there.

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK