> Hello Alex, Hi
> The important thing first: as usual, this post is
>
> ABSOLUTELY NOT FOR BROADCAST on the Forum !
I see this differently: this is extremely important that your message appears publicly. The reason is that a public message can be replied to. And yours definitely warrants a reply.
First, thank you for your insight. I am going to extend that page.
Second, I am humbly asking you to observe that this forum's sole purpose is to discuss mathematics and not getting under each other skin - putting it mildly. I am again asking you to please keep your distance.
> Now, in the drawing of the last Sangaku in the bottom right
>corner
> there is triangle QLC (75-60-45) which is similar to BPL
>(75-60-45)
>
> Triangle PQL is right at Q and PL = 2 QL (draw median QW
>from
> Q on PL and WQL is equlateral). So LQC can be rotated 120
>deg. into
> top portion of PLB with rotation center on angle bisector
>of PLQ.
> Thus incircle of QLC is half of the incircle of BPL.
>
> In right triangle LCD cevian CQ clearly is the cevian of
>congruent
> incircles of LCD and CQD.
>
> Thus we have a pair of obvious 'twin' incircles , and more
> hidden ones all over the square, (especially if we do not
>get
> fixated of the numbers 1 and 2 as homothety ratios, we
>should treat
> all numbers equally, egalite tak skazat' ).
For the sake of those who do not speak Russian, I'll translate the above and the gibberish that followed:
"we should treat all numbers equally, 'egalite' so to speak.
> No esli ne priniat' specialnyh mer, to eti ... geometry
> will go crazy looking for them, odnazhdy uzhe byl
>pretsedent.
>
> Poetomu, etot poisk dolzhen byt pod surovym kontrolem
>sverhu.
>
> Salute,
>
> Maj. Paul Litra-Spirta
>
But, without special actions those ... geometry will go crazy looking for them, a precedent once happened.
For this reason, this search must be carried out under a strict control from above.
Salut,
Maj. Half Litre-(Of alcohol)