|
|
|Store|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CTK Exchange
NJZ
Member since Mar-23-02
|
Jul-24-02, 08:15 PM (EST) |
 |
"Mathematics of General Relativity"
|
Since physics and math are closely tied, I felt this question would be appropriate for this message board. Although I have had no formal schooling in mathematics beyond basic calculus, I have a reasonable aptitude for and a profound interest in both mathematics and theoretical physics. I have recently begun studying General Relativity, and am trying to determine which areas of mathematics I will need to master in order to comprehend the technical aspects of Einstein's theory. The topics I believe to be most relevant are: single and multivariable calculus, ordinary and partial differential equations, linear algebra, vector analysis, tensor analysis, and differential geometry. If anyone out there has studied General Relativity and could let me know what topics need to be added to (or removed from) this list, any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page | Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
 |
|
 |
alexb
Charter Member
799 posts |
Jul-25-02, 08:44 AM (EST) |
 |
3. "RE: General Relativity"
In response to message #2
|
Dear NJZ, truth be told, I find your intention staggering. The scope of your list is too comprehensive. Manifolds must be useful in your quest of course, but somehow I feel that by the time you up along your list, you'll be able to pass a better judgement whether or how much of the manifolds you need. As the General Relativity was Einstein's attempt at a unified field theory, which since took up a radically different direction, your quest should eventually lead you to the string theory so that other branches of math would become relevant. I am just incapable of seeing that far. |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page | Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
|
andrew cooke

guest
|
Aug-21-02, 07:47 PM (EST) |
|
6. "RE: Mathematics of GR"
In response to message #0
|
I never finished the GR course (IIRC), but I found Schutz's "Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics" a good, clear explanation of the differential geometry required. |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page | Edit |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|

You may be curious to visit the old CTK Exchange archive.
|Front page|
|Contents|
|Store|
Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
Advertise
|
|