|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CTK Exchange
Brad
guest
|
Jan-23-07, 10:52 PM (EST) |
|
"Help no one else seems to be able to give me..."
|
I had a question, and my parents, math teachers, etc. can't help me. Maybe someone here can. I've never done any sort of difficult math (I'm in 9th grade, Algebra 2) and no one can help me with this. I'm not even sure how to notate what I'm asking, but I'll try: z=x^(y-x) This is the equation. What I want to know is, for a specified value y, what value of x will make z the biggest? What I want is an equation that, in terms of y, returns the maximum value of z, with x. So, I'm asking, with a set y, what x will make z the biggest. Sorry if you're confused... Thats the only way I know how to explain it. |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
|
JJ
guest
|
Jan-24-07, 05:01 AM (EST) |
|
2. "RE: Help no one else seems to be able to give me..."
In response to message #1
|
z = x^(y-x) = exp((y-x)ln(x)) dz/dx = z*(((y - x)/x) - ln(x)) = 0 (y - x)/x) - ln(x) = 0 y = x x*ln(x) = x*(1 ln(x)) = x*ln(e*x) Let Y = e*y and X = e*x then : Y = X*ln(X) The roots of this kind of equation cannot be expressed in terms of elementary function, but in term of the special function named the "Lambert's W function". See : https://mathworld.wolfram.com/LambertW-Function.html The result is : X = exp(W(Y)) Finally : x = exp(W(e*y)-1) . Remark : In case of some particular value of y, eventually this special function may be reduced to an elementary function. |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
|
|
Brad
guest
|
Jan-24-07, 07:33 AM (EST) |
|
3. "RE: Help no one else seems to be able to give me..."
In response to message #2
|
On the first comment, it has to be possible. Think about it: x^(10-x) has to have a maximum value. With it notated (x,x^(10-x)): 1,1 2,256 3,2187 4,4096 5,3125 6,1296 7,343 8,64 9,9 10,1 With 0<x<1, the value will always be between 0 and 1. Oh!!! Maybe this will help. X cannot be negative. With my original function, x^(y-x), 0=<x=<y. I hope you guys can see where I'm going with this now... Bye Brad |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
|
|
Ricardo
guest
|
Jan-27-07, 07:44 AM (EST) |
|
4. "RE: Help no one else seems to be able to give me..."
In response to message #3
|
That was a nice question Brad! What these guys above are saying is that even thought, as you argued, there is a function that does that, in general there is no "nice" equation for it. The "no nice function equation" is in fact a common occurrence in mathematics. The 'solution' for that is to find a simpler function that approximates the "ugly" function or to make some computer program/algorithm that gives good approximations of it. These "approximation methods" have lots of nice ideas actually, and you are going to see some of them if you do a calculus course. Ricardo
|
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
|
|
Kh4o$
guest
|
Feb-05-07, 11:19 PM (EST) |
|
5. "RE: Help no one else seems to be able to give me..."
In response to message #3
|
>On the first comment, it has to be possible. Think about >it: >x^(10-x) has to have a maximum value. With it notated >(x,x^(10-x)): >1,1 >2,256 >3,2187 >4,4096 >5,3125 >6,1296 >7,343 >8,64 >9,9 >10,1 >With 0<x<1, the value will always be between 0 and 1. Oh!!! > Maybe this will help. X cannot be negative. With my >original function, >x^(y-x), 0=<x=<y. I hope you guys can see where I'm going >with this now... >Bye >Brad Hmm, the solution above only applied for integral, Which is not stated in the problem. In addition, it's done by trial and error ??? =.=' And the solution provided by JJ is way to complex for me ( a grade 12 student, lol). That being said, this kind of problem is way too ambiguity ( or you'd prefer: general)for high school or even first year university, so you'd better not fooling around with it. Come back when you have a specific number for y :P. Regards. |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
|
You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive. Please do not post there.
Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny
|
|