CTK Exchange
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Reciprocal links
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "simple puzzle-why?"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange Middle school Topic #78
Reading Topic #78
Jack
guest
Jan-20-03, 12:53 PM (EST)
 
"simple puzzle-why?"
 
   This seems simple but....
A car racer needs to complete two one mile courses at an average speed of 60mph. He can only manage 30mph for the first mile. How fast must he go for the second?
It SEEMS the answer should be 90.

BUT, to average 60mph, he must complete the two courses in 2 minutes and it takes him 2 minutes for the first, to it can't be done? What is the mathmatical reason?


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexb
Charter Member
1811 posts
Jan-20-03, 01:34 PM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: simple puzzle-why?"
In response to message #0
 
   >This seems simple but....
>A car racer needs to complete two one mile courses at an
>average speed of 60mph. He can only manage 30mph for the
>first mile. How fast must he go for the second?
>It SEEMS the answer should be 90.

Not at all. See

https://www.cut-the-knot.com/arithmetic/Means.shtml

>
>BUT, to average 60mph, he must complete the two courses in 2
>minutes and it takes him 2 minutes for the first, to it
>can't be done? What is the mathmatical reason?

The mathematical reason for the fallacy is in uncritical usage of the word "SEEMS". Can't built a lot on what only "seems".


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
G Cleverley
guest
Jan-21-03, 10:00 AM (EST)
 
2. "RE: simple puzzle-why?"
In response to message #1
 
   No quarrel with your answer, but there is an ambiguity in the original definition of the racer's target. What has to be 60 mph - the average of the two speeds in the two courses, or the average speed over the two miles taken together?

In the first case, if he does 30 mph for the first course and 90 for the second, then the average of the two speeds (not his average speed) is 60, and he has met his target. It works like this in ski-ing.

He will have travelled the total two miles in 2 minutes 40 seconds, so his average speed over the two miles is 45 mph.

In the second case then if he only averages 30 for the first mile then of course he can't average 60 over the two miles.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
Sesshoumaru
guest
Feb-14-03, 07:10 AM (EST)
 
3. "RE: simple puzzle-why?"
In response to message #0
 
   Here's the "simple" reason:

Since you go 30 mph the first time around, it takes you a minute, right?

Since you want to avg. 60 MPH, you use the time of 60MPH, which is for two miles, 2 minutes.

Since he has already spent 2 minutes...

the end result would be something like if you use r*t=d (rate*time=distance)

Total Distance
-------------- = Avg. Speed
Total Time

1
--- = r/60
2-2

You cannot divide by zero, so there is no answer.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
iliaden
Member since Aug-14-05
Apr-02-06, 10:23 PM (EST)
Click to EMail iliaden Click to send private message to iliaden Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
4. "RE: simple puzzle-why?"
In response to message #3
 
   I might be mistaking, but in this situation, the division by zero of an integer would give infinity as an anwer. Thus his speed would have to be the speed of light, or the theoretical maximum.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive.
Please do not post there.

|Front page| |Contents|

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK