CTK Exchange
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Manifesto: what CTK is about |Store| Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot

CTK Exchange

Subject: "mode - interpret definition"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange Middle school Topic #61
Reading Topic #61
timl14
Member since Feb-21-02
Feb-21-02, 09:45 PM (EST)
Click to EMail timl14 Click to send private message to timl14 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"mode - interpret definition"
 
   I have a question regarding an interpretation of the definition for the statistical term: mode
I teach 7th grade math. There has been some discussion within our dept. regarding the definition of mode. One of my colleagues and myself have always taught that the mode is that term that appears most frequently in a set of data. There can be more than one mode or no mode. If a set of data contains for example, 4,4,4,5,5,5, then there is no mode because there is no one term that appears more than the others. Yet one of our textbooks gives that example and lists both 4 and 5 as the modes. One of our colleagues who teaches from this particular book agrees that 4 and 5 both in the above example are modes. Who is correct? Please cite any references you may have.
Thank you.
Linda


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexb
Charter Member
672 posts
Feb-21-02, 10:12 PM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: mode - interpret definition"
In response to message #0
 
   LAST EDITED ON Feb-21-02 AT 10:21 PM (EST)
 
>There can be more than one mode or no mode.

Right. But read you next statement:

>If a set of
>data contains for example, 4,4,4,5,5,5, then there is no
>mode because there is no one term that appears more than the
>others.

This can't be the reason that that sample has no mode, because, as you correctly stated, there may be more than one mode.

Here's a quote from P. Tannenbaum & R. Arnold's Excursions in Modern Mathematics, Prentice Hall, 4th edition, 2001, p 505-506:


The mode of a data set is the data that occurs with the highest frequency. ... When there are several data points (or categories) tied for the most frequent, each of them is a mode, but if all data points have the same frequency, rather than say that every data point is a mode, it is customary to say that there is no mode.

REA's Problem Solvers: Statistics, REA 1994, p 13 is more lenient:

Problem 1-20:

Find the mode of the sample 14, 16, 21, 19, 18, 24 and 17.

Solution: In this sample all the numbers occur with the same frequency. There is no single number which is observed more frequently than any other. Thus there is no mode or all observations are modes. The mode is not a useful concept here.

Math On Call, Great Source Education Group, Inc., 1998, p 276:

CASE 1: Sometimes there is one value that occurs more often than any other.

CASE 2: Sometimes there is more than one value that occurs most often. In this case, all these highest values are modes for the set of data.

CASE 3: Sometimes there is no value that occurs more often than the others. In this case, there is no mode.

>Yet one of our textbooks gives that example and
>lists both 4 and 5 as the modes. One of our colleagues who
>teaches from this particular book agrees that 4 and 5 both
>in the above example are modes. Who is correct? Please
>cite any references you may have.

The choice appears to be between not using and using the concept of the mode when it is not useful.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
timl14
Member since Feb-21-02
Feb-24-02, 04:32 PM (EST)
Click to EMail timl14 Click to send private message to timl14 Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
2. "RE: mode - interpret definition"
In response to message #1
 
   This makes much more sense. Thank you.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Edit | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to visit the old CTK Exchange archive.

|Front page| |Contents|

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
 Advertise

New Books
Second editions of J. Conway's classic On Numbers And Games and the inimitable Winning Ways for Your Mathematical Plays