>Thank you very much for the Pythagorean proofs, which are 
>very useful to me. Thank you for letting me know.
>I just noticed that my brother, Don Wagner, is cited in #28. 
> However the link to his work is incorrectly located under 
>the name Elisha Loomis. 
No, if you read just the next paragraph, Douglas Rogers, questioned the association of Liu Hui's name with this particular proof. I believe that in the ensuing correspondence Don Wagner admitted that his interpretation of Liu Hui's writing (that came to us without a diagram) is rather tenuous. As the proof has appeared in Loomis with some comments, this is where I made a link to. A link to Don Wagner's follows at the bottom of the page.
>I also would like to report that my remarkable 9-year old 
>friend Toby in San Leandro California recently produced 
>proof #10, on his own: 
It's quite recognizable on the drawing, yes.
>
>I was teaching him the necessary algebra manipulations so 
>that he could develop proof #3 on his own.  However he went 
>off on his own and invented a proof that I had never seen 
>before.   I had trouble believing it, not to mention 
>understanding his diagram 
>(https:// home.comcast.net/~papasandy/toby-pythag-diagram.jpg 
The big thing distracts from the smaller diagram which you probably had in mind.
>), which was so clear to him but hard for me to follow.  He 
>did finally explain himself well enough so that I knew what 
>he was trying to say, so I went home and proved to myself 
>that he was absolutely right.  It's a rare person of any age 
>who develops his/her own proof of this theorem, and I'm 
>lucky to be working with him. 
And what did he say?
>I am interested in talking with others who are working with 
>young gifted students. 
Regretfully, this may not be the right forum for the purpose, but I shall be grateful if anybody points you in the right direction.