CTK Exchange
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Reciprocal links
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Products to download and subscription Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "Error in the comparing imaginary numbers page"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange Thoughts and Suggestions Topic #5
Reading Topic #5
Chris
guest
Feb-23-07, 10:48 AM (EST)
 
"Error in the comparing imaginary numbers page"
 
   In the page that talks about comparing imaginary numbers (https://www.cut-the-knot.org/do_you_know/complex_compare.shtml) you mention and example where -1<1, you multiply by i, then i again and you get 1<(-1) -but by multiplying by i twice you are forgetting your inequality rules- you must switch the less than sign to be more then: ergo 1>(-1) and the property holds. Be careful.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexbadmin
Charter Member
1962 posts
Feb-23-07, 11:00 AM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Error in the comparing imaginary numbers page"
In response to message #0
 
   No, there is no error.

With the reals you expect

(1) a < b and 0 < c imply ac < bc.

With the complex numbers, either assumption

0 < i or 0 < -i

leads to a contradiction if (1) is assumed to work in the complex case as well. Because, as you point out, i = -1. Which leads to a change of direction in the inequality. The trouble is this direction change is not implied by (1).


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive.
Please do not post there.

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK