Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Infinitude of Primes
Via *-Sets

A *-set is a finite set of positive integers {a1, ..., an} such that

(1) ai - aj divides ai

for all distinct i and j. |X| denotes for the size of set X, e.g. |{a1, ..., an}| = n.

Lemma 1

  For all n ≥ 2, there is a *-set of size n.

Proof

The proof is by induction. |{1, 2}| = 2 and obviously {1, 2} is a *-set.

Suppose {a1, ..., an} is a *-set. Define b0 = a1·...·an, the product of all ak's, k = 1, ..., n. Let bk = b0 + ak, k = 1, ..., n. Then X = {bk: k = 0, ..., n} is a *-set and |X| = n + 1.

Lemma 2

  Suppose {a1, ..., an} is a *-set of size n. For k = 1, ..., n, define fk = 2ak + 1. Then the numbers f1, ..., fn are mutually prime.

Proof

Assume there are fk and fm, fk > fm, divisible by the same odd prime p. Then p divides 2am(2ak - am - 1).

Since p is odd, it ought to divide 2ak - am - 1. Now, if s|t then 2s - 1 | 2t - 1; thus, by definition of the *-set, 2ak - am - 1 divides 2ak - 1. So that p | 2ak - 1. But also p | 2ak + 1. We conclude that p|2 which contradicts the assumption of p being an odd prime.

Theorem

  There exists an infinite number of primes.

Proof

By lemmas 1 and 2, for any N, there is a set of N mutually prime terms and, therefore, the same number of distinct primes. Thus the assumption that the number of primes is finite would lead to a contradiction.

Reference

  1. M. Gilchrist, A Proof That There Are an Infinite Number of Rational Primes, Am Math Monthly, 114 (August-September 2007), p. 622

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

28735520Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
Math
Posted by Laura
2 messages
06:56 AM, Apr-15-08

Divisibility rules - Jargon buste ...
Posted by Carolyn
2 messages
08:35 AM, Apr-04-08

drawing puzzle
Posted by martin gran
31 messages
06:53 PM, May-09-08

conway's game of life
Posted by frequency
0 messages
11:52 PM, May-12-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

Deriving functions based on diffe ...
Posted by ke_45
1 messages
12:47 PM, May-10-08

Josephus Flavius (correction)
Posted by David Turner
0 messages
08:17 AM, May-14-08