Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

A continuous linear function must have the form f(x) = ax. Discontinuous linear functions look dreadful.

To be more specific, I am going to discuss real valued functions of one real variable, i.e. f: RR, where R is, as usual, the set of all real numbers. Such a function is called linear provided the following condition holds:

(*) For every two real x1 and x2, f(x1 + x2) = f(x1) + f(x2)

Assuming that the function f is also continuous I plan to show that f(x) = ax for some real a. Please note that if indeed f(x) = ax then a = f(1) which provides a starting point for the proof. But first let me note that (*) contains an unknown which, as we are going to establish, is equal to f(x) = ax. In other words, (*) serves as an example of a functional equation - an equation whose unknown is a function.

Proof

The proof proceeds in several steps.

  1. x is 0.
      f(0) = f(0 + 0) = f(0) + f(0) = 2f(0).

    Therefore f(0) = 2f(0) and finally f(0) = 0.

  2. x is negative.

    Let x be negative, e.g., let x + y = 0, where y is positive; so that -x = y. Then

      0 = f(0) = f(x + y) = f(x) + f(y).

    Therefore f(-x) = f(y) = -f(x).

  3. x is an integer.

    We have f(2) = f(1 + 1) = f(1) + f(1) = 2f(1). By induction, assume f(k - 1) = (k - 1)f(1). Then

      f(k) = f(1 + (k-1)) = f(1) + (k-1)f(1) = kf(1).

    Let's denote a = f(1). We have shown that for all integers n, f(n) = an.

  4. x is rational

    First of all, for any integer n0, we have 1 = n/n. Then, as before, a = f(1) = f(n/n) = nf(1/n). Hence, f(1/n) = a/n = a(1/n). For p = m/n we similarly have

      f(p) = f(m/n) = mf(1/n) = m·a/n = a(m/n) = ap.

  5. x is irrational

    Any irrational number r can be approximated by a sequence of rational numbers pi. The closer pi is to r, the closer api is to ar. However, since api = f(pi) and assuming f continuous we must necessarily get  f(r) = ar.

Continuity of the function is quite essential as it's possible to show [Ref. 1, 2] that the graph of any discontinuous solution to (*) is dense in the plane R2. For the sake of reference, the graph of a function f: RR is defined as a set of pairs (x, y), i.e. elements of R2 such that y = f(x). Formally, graph(f) = {(x, y)R2: y = f(x)}.

Remark

Generally speaking, a function that satisfies (*) is called additive. The function that satisfies f(x) = ax for some a is said to be homogeneous. A function is said to be linear if it's both additive and homogeneous. We have just shown that a continuous additive function is necessarily linear.

References

  1. B. R. Gelbaum and J. M. H. Olmsted, Counterexamples in Analysis, Holden-Day, 1964
  2. B. R. Gelbaum and J. M. H. Olmsted, Theorems and Counterexamples in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, 1990

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

28695477Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
Math
Posted by Laura
2 messages
06:56 AM, Apr-15-08

Divisibility rules - Jargon buste ...
Posted by Carolyn
2 messages
08:35 AM, Apr-04-08

drawing puzzle
Posted by martin gran
31 messages
06:53 PM, May-09-08

Distance to the horizon
Posted by Monty
3 messages
04:38 PM, May-08-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

Deriving functions based on diffe ...
Posted by ke_45
1 messages
12:47 PM, May-10-08

A typo in
Posted by alexwajn
1 messages
11:36 PM, Apr-19-08