Rouse Ball's Fallacy
What Is Wrong?

According to J. dePillis, George Pólya used to define Geometry as the science of correct reasoning on incorrect figures. The quote in Eves is a little different: Geometry is the art of correct reasoning on incorrect figures, although the reference is exactly the same: How to Solve It?, 1945. (I have no way of verifying whose version is the correct one as, unfortunately, I could not locate the referenced quote in my 1973 edition. Might be missing the obvious.)

Either way, something is wrong with the diagram presented in the applet below. The reason I am so sure about that is because absolutely flawless reasoning based on that figure leads to an absurd result. The question is what is wrong?


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

The construction is as follows. Form a right angle ADC and an obtuse angle DAE (away from DC) so that DC = AE. Since the two segments EC and AD are not parallel, their perpendicular bisectors are not parallel either. Let them meet in point O. Let K and H be the midpoints of EC and DA, respectively. Then

(1)CO = EO, because ΔCEO is isosceles.
(2)DO = AO, because ΔADO is isosceles.
(3)DC = AE, by construction.

By the SSS criterion, ΔOCD = ΔOEA. Therefore,

(4)∠CDO = ∠EAO,

but also,

(5)∠ADO = ∠DAO.

Subtracting (5) from (4) yields

(5)90o = ∠ADC = ∠DAE.

We arrive at an absurd conclusion that the obtuse angle DAE is in fact right in contradiction with the construction.

What is wrong?

|Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Geometry| |Fallacies| |Store|

Copyright © 1996-2012 Alexander Bogomolny


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?
 

Had the construction been 100% correct, the line EO would have lain outside the quadrilateral ADCE. In which case the subtraction (4) - (5) would have been meaningless. To get the fallacy, I shortened AE by 4%. This was enough to make EO pass inside the quadrilateral when AE was close to vertical.

References

  1. J. dePillis, 777 Mathematical Conversation Starters, MAA, 2002, p. 114
  2. H. W. Eves, Return to Mathematical Circles, PWS-KENT Publ Co, 1988, p. 79
  3. W.W. Rouse Ball and H.S.M. Coxeter, Mathematical Recreations and Essays, Dover, 1987

Related material
Read more...

Geometric Fallacies

  • A Circle With Two Centers
  • All Triangles Are Isosceles
  • Two Perpendiculars From a Point to a Line
  • Is Every Trapezoid Parallelogram?
  • Every Parallelogram Is a Rectangle
  • |Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Geometry| |Fallacies| |Store|

    Copyright © 1996-2012 Alexander Bogomolny

     40601131

    A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
    Sites for teachers
    Sites for parents
    Terms of use
    Awards
    Interactive Activities

    CTK Exchange
    CTK Wiki Math
    CTK Insights - a blog
    Math Help
    Games & Puzzles
    What Is What
    Arithmetic
    Algebra
    Geometry
    Probability
    Outline Mathematics
    Make an Identity
    Book Reviews
    Stories for Young
    Eye Opener
    Analog Gadgets
    Inventor's Paradox
    Did you know?...
    Proofs
    Math as Language
    Things Impossible
    Visual Illusions
    My Logo
    Math Poll
    Cut The Knot!
    MSET99 Talk
    Old and nice bookstore
    Other Math sites
    Front Page
    Movie shortcuts
    Personal info
    Privacy Policy

    Guest book
    News sites

    Recommend this site

    Sites for parents

    Education & Parenting

    Search:
    Keywords:

    Google
    Web CTK
    Supported by
    3wVentures