All Triangles Are Isosceles
How Is It Possible?


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

I plan to show that all triangles are isosceles, or at least all acute triangles are. Given such an acute ABC, find the intersection P of the bisector of angle C and the perpendicular bisector at the midpoint M of side AB. Drop perpendiculars PU and PV on the sides AC and BC, respectively.

Now, since MP is the perpendicular bisector of AB, triangles AMP and BMP are equal by SAS. Therefore, AP = BP. Right triangles CPU and CPV share a side (CP) and have equal angles at C. By ASA, they are equal. Therefore, CU = CV and PU = PV. In right triangles APU and BPV,

PU = PV and
AP = BP.

They are therefore equal by SSS. Therefore, AU = BV. But then

AC = AU + CU = BV + CV = BC.

Note that we showed that any two sides of a triangle are equal. As a consquence, we may rightly conclude that all three are, meaning that all triangles are equilateral.

How come?

|Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Geometry| |Fallacies| |Store|

Copyright © 1996-2015 Alexander Bogomolny


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

The problem is with the drawing. The angle bisector of C and the perpendicular bisector of AB always intersect on the circumcircle of ABC. This is because the angle bisector from C divides the arc AB opposite C into two equal parts. The same effect is obviously achieved by the perpendicular bisector of AB that passes through the circumcenter.

The original diagram is intentionally misleading.

References

  1. V. M. Bradis et al, Lapses in Mathematical Reasoning, Dover, 1999, pp. 137-138
  2. C. W. Dodge, Euclidean Geometry and Transformations, Dover, 2004 (reprint of 1972 edition), 7.23.

Related material
Read more...

Geometric Fallacies

  • A Circle With Two Centers
  • Rouse Ball's Fallacy
  • Two Perpendiculars From a Point to a Line
  • Is Every Trapezoid Parallelogram?
  • Every Parallelogram Is a Rectangle
  • |Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Store| |Geometry|

    Copyright © 1996-2015 Alexander Bogomolny

     49551894

    Google
    Web CTK