|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CTK Exchange
Kenneth Ramsey
guest
|
Jun-27-10, 06:06 PM (EST) |
|
"Novel Square Triangular Nos. Generalization?"
|
Certain triangular numbers are also square numbers: e.g. T(8) = 36 = 6^2, T(49) = 1225 = 35^2. It is well known that the arguments of the square triangular numbers {0,1,8,49,288 ...} have the recursive formula S(n) = 6*S(n-1) - S(n-2) + 2 while the square roots of the square triangular numbers {0,1,6,35,204,...} have the recursive formula Q(n) = 6*Q(n-1) - Q(n-2). As far as I know, no one has observed that the first two numbers of the S(n) series can be put into the generalized form "0" and "4a+1" while the first two numbers of the Q(n) series can be put into the form "a" and "3a + 1" where "a" can be any integer and that the general relationship is now T(S(n)) = (Q(n)+a)*(Q(n)-a). The same recursive equations apply. Where "a" = 0, these are the square triangular numbers; otherwise, each of the triangular numbers can be factored as x(x+2a)for all n. For instance let "a" = 1 S(n) = {0,5,32,189,...} Q(n) = {1,4,23,134,...}T(0) = 0*2=0 T(5) = 3*5=15 T(32) =22*24=528 T(189) =133*135=17955 ... Because the recursive formula of S(n) is S(n) = 6*S(n-1) - S(n-2) + 2 there is no common method to determine a closed form formula (non-recursive) for the nth term but there is a simple way around this. To find the close form equation for the nth term of the S(n) series for various values of "a", we consider the modified series S<n> formed by adding 1/2 to each term of S(n) so that the recursive formula is now S<n> = 6S<n-1> - S<n-2>. To determine the close form formula for such a series is straight forward. Then we can use the relation S(n) = S<n> - 1/2. Can anyone suggest where I might find disclosures of my finding prior to mine. If there are any, I would like to know |
|
Alert | IP |
Printer-friendly page |
Reply |
Reply With Quote | Top |
|
|
You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive. Please do not post there.
Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny
|
|