CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Products to download and subscription Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "Novel Square Triangular Nos. Generalization?"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange College math Topic #732
Reading Topic #732
Kenneth Ramsey
guest
Jun-27-10, 06:06 PM (EST)
 
"Novel Square Triangular Nos. Generalization?"
 
   Certain triangular numbers are also square numbers: e.g. T(8) = 36 = 6^2, T(49) = 1225 = 35^2. It is well known that the arguments of the square triangular numbers {0,1,8,49,288 ...} have the recursive formula S(n) = 6*S(n-1) - S(n-2) + 2 while the square roots of the square triangular numbers {0,1,6,35,204,...} have the recursive formula Q(n) = 6*Q(n-1) - Q(n-2). As far as I know, no one has observed that the first two numbers of the S(n) series can be put into the generalized form "0" and "4a+1" while the first two numbers of the Q(n) series can be put into the form "a" and "3a + 1" where "a" can be any integer and that the general relationship is now T(S(n)) = (Q(n)+a)*(Q(n)-a). The same recursive equations apply.
Where "a" = 0, these are the square triangular numbers; otherwise, each of the triangular numbers can be factored as x(x+2a)for all n.
For instance let "a" = 1
S(n) = {0,5,32,189,...}
Q(n) = {1,4,23,134,...}

T(0) = 0*2=0
T(5) = 3*5=15
T(32) =22*24=528
T(189) =133*135=17955
...
Because the recursive formula of S(n) is S(n) = 6*S(n-1) - S(n-2) + 2 there is no common method to determine a closed form formula (non-recursive) for the nth term but there is a simple way around this. To find the close form equation for the nth term of the S(n) series for various values of "a", we consider the modified series S<n> formed by adding 1/2 to each term of S(n) so that the recursive formula is now S<n> = 6S<n-1> - S<n-2>. To determine the close form formula for such a series is straight forward. Then we can use the relation S(n) = S<n> - 1/2.

Can anyone suggest where I might find disclosures of my finding prior to mine. If there are any, I would like to know


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexbadmin
Charter Member
2523 posts
Jun-28-10, 07:14 AM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Novel Square Triangular Nos. Generalization?"
In response to message #0
 
   Sorry I can't help you. The best I can do is to check with the wikipedia, which is available to everyone.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive.
Please do not post there.

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK