CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Products to download and subscription Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "Nondifferentiability without limits"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange This and that Topic #979
Reading Topic #979
jmolokach
Member since Jan-11-11
Jan-19-11, 08:39 AM (EST)
Click to EMail jmolokach Click to send private message to jmolokach Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Nondifferentiability without limits"
 
I found this link for "derivatives without limits"

https://www.cut-the-knot.org/wiki-math/index.php?n=Calculus.DerivativesWithoutLimits

..and thought it was rather interesting. Then I wondered if one could show that a function is not differentiable without limits. Well here it goes:

Problem: Find the slope of the tangent line to the graph of y = x^(2/3) at the point (0,0).

Solution: The line must pass through the y-axis at 0, so let y = mx be the equation of the line. Then we have:

x^(2/3) = mx

x^2 = (mx)^3

m = (1/x)^(1/3) which is undefined at x = 0

Therefore the slope of the tangent line to the graph of y = x^(2/3) at (0,0) has a slope that is undefined, and is therefore nondifferentiable at x = 0.

Possible flaws:

1) Not forcing b = 0 for the line leads to an ugly mess, and solving for m is algebra I would leave to wolframalpha.
2) I expect m to equal (2/3)(1/x)^(1/3) and I am missing the (2/3) in my writeup above. Why is this?

molokach


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexbadmin
Charter Member
2718 posts
Jan-20-11, 12:06 PM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Nondifferentiability without limits"
In response to message #0
 
   >x^(2/3) = mx

I do not understand that.

If that is an equation in x then you may say "assume these two are equal for some x. Let's find those x." Then the solution is obvious x = 0, y = 0, and is well defined.

If that is an equation in m then x needs to be specified.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive.
Please do not post there.

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK