CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Awards
Terms of use
Privacy Policy

Interactive Activities

Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Games & Puzzles
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
My Logo
Math Poll
Other Math sit's
Guest book
News sit's

Recommend this site

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Products to download and subscription Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

CTK Exchange

Subject: "Trigonometric proof of the Pythagorean Theorem"     Previous Topic | Next Topic
Printer-friendly copy     Email this topic to a friend    
Conferences The CTK Exchange Thoughts and Suggestions Topic #103
Reading Topic #103
jdawson
Member since Apr-2-11
Apr-02-11, 10:05 PM (EST)
Click to EMail jdawson Click to send private message to jdawson Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
"Trigonometric proof of the Pythagorean Theorem"
 
   While I find Jason Zimba's proof interesting, I am puzzled why it'should have taken so long for someone to cast a proof of the Pythagorean Theorem in trigonometric form. To see that the geometric definitions of the trigonometric functions are well-defined requires similarity theory. But granting that, it is easy to modify Euclid's similarity proof (VI,31) without resort to the sum or difference identities. For let c be the hypotenuse of right triangle ABC, and draw the altitude from the opposite angle, C. Then
c = a cos B + b cos A, and similar triangles yield that
a/(a cos B) = c/a and b/(b cos A) = c/b. Replacing c in the last two equations by the right member of the first equation and then cross-multiplying gives

a^2 = a^2 (cos B)^2 + ab cos A cos B and
b^2 = ab cos A cos B + b^2 (cos A)^2 . Hence

a^2 + b^2 = a^2 (cos B)^2 +2ab cos A cos B + b^2 (cos A)^2
= (a cos B + b cos A)^2 = c^2 .

This would seem to me to be a "purely trigonometric proof". Am I missing something?


JWD


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top
alexbadmin
Charter Member
2790 posts
Apr-03-11, 10:48 PM (EST)
Click to EMail alexb Click to send private message to alexb Click to view user profileClick to add this user to your buddy list  
1. "RE: Trigonometric proof of the Pythagorean Theorem"
In response to message #0
 
   The problem is actually reverse.

Almost every proof may have been cast in a trigonometric form. I would not care about that. The question is, given a trigonometric proof, how easy it would be to recast it into the proportionality terms. That may be a subjective call. I judged that, for Zimba's proof, such conversion would be cumbersome. For this reason I acknowledged the proof as trigonometric.


  Alert | IP Printer-friendly page | Reply | Reply With Quote | Top

Conferences | Forums | Topics | Previous Topic | Next Topic

You may be curious to have a look at the old CTK Exchange archive.
Please do not post there.

Copyright © 1996-2018 Alexander Bogomolny

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK