Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Learning Math Online
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

Pythagorean Theorem: Subtle Dangers of Visual Proof

This is a dynamic illustration of a faulty proof of the Pythagorean Theorem. The argument is by dissection and rearrangement and is included as geometric proof 22 in Loomis' collection.

The proof resembles others of this variety: for example, proofs 26, 27, 36. However, unlike those mentioned, this proof contains a subtle point that was apparently overlooked by E. S. Loomis. The construction as it is described in the book can't be carried through in some of the possible configurations of the Bride's Chair. To see the reason, drag the right-angled vertex to make one of the legs considerably shorter than the other.


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


This is now listed as #3 among the faulty proofs of the Pythagorean theorem. The applet above shows that the argument can be amended into a real proof by considering the dynamics of the dissections as has been done, e.g. when comparing by equidecomposition two parallelograms with the same altitude and base.

References

  1. E. S. Loomis, The Pythagorean Proposition, NCTM, 1968

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

34222687Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK