Carnot's Theorem

Carnot's theorem is a direct application of the theorem of Pythagoras. It's a nice little theorem that is unlikely to be rediscovered with dynamic geometry software. A penchant for doodling and imagination this is all that is probably needed to rediscover a theorem like that.

Let points A', B', and C' be located on the sides BC, AC, and respectively AB of ΔABC. The perpendiculars to the sides of the triangle at points A', B', and C' are concurrent iff

(1) AC'² - BC'² + BA'² - CA'² + CB'² - AB'² = 0.

Proof

Assume the three perpendiculars meet in point P. The lines AP, BP, CP, A'P, B'P, C'P split the triangle into six right-angled triangles, three pairs of which share a hypotenuse, whilst three other pairs share a leg with a vertex at P. The situation begs for an application of the Pythagorean theorem:

AC'² + C'P² = AP²
BC'² + C'P² = BP²
BA'² + A'P² = BP²
CA'² + A'P² = CP²
CB'² + B'P² = CP²
AB'² + B'P² = AP².

Taking the first, third, and fifth equations with the sign "+", and the second, fourth, and sixth equations with the sign "-", and adding up all six leads, after obvious simplifications, to (1).

To proof the converse, assume (1) and let P be the point of intersection of, say, A'P and B'P. Drop a perpendicular DP from P to AB. By the already proven part:

AD² - BD² + BA'² - CA'² + CB'² - AB² = 0,

so that

(2) AD² - BD² = AC'² - BC'².

This is only possible if D = C'. Why so. Let BD = x, AB = c. Then AD = c - x, and

AD² - BD² = (c - x)² - x² = c² - 2cx,

which is a linear function of x: f(x) = c² - 2cx. f therefore is 1-1. In other words, f(x) can't have the same value for two different x's. This means that (2) does imply D = C'.

We are naturally coming to a related problem: Given two points A and B. What is the locus of points M such that AM² - BM² is constant?

Let M be a point on the locus and H the foot of the perpendicular from M to AB. By the Pythagorean theorem:

AM² - AH² = MH² = BM² - BH²,

i.e.,

  AM² - BM² = AH² - BH²,

which means that, if M lies on the locus in question, so does H. And vice versa. Since the same H serves as the foot of the perpendicular MH for all points M of the line perpendicular to AB at H, this line solves the problem.

If we place the origin of a Cartesian coordinates system at B with the x-axis along AB and the y-axis perpendicular to it, we may assign coordinates (x, y) to point M. Then

BM² = x² + y², whereas
AM² = (c - x)² + y².

Thus, as above,

AM² - BM² = (c - x)² + y² - x² - y² = f(x),

where f(x) is the function defined above. If x is fixed, so is f(x), and also AM² - BM², as expected. From this fact, or from the underlying proof, it is clear that, for (1) to hold, the points A', B' C' need not be necessarily located on the sides of ΔABC.

Corollary

  1. Perpendicular bisectors of the sides of a triangle concur in a point (the circumcenter.)

    Indeed, AC' = BC', BA' = CA', and CB' = AB' imply (1).

  2. The altitudes of a triangle concur in a point.

    Indeed, if AA', BB', and CC' are altitudes of ΔABC, then

    AB² - BA'² = AA'² = AC² - CA'²,

    so that

    AB² - AC² = BA'² - CA'²,

    Similarly,

    AC² - BC² = AC'² - BC'² and
    BC² - AB² = CB'² - AB'², which,

    when added, give (1).

  3. The perpendiculars to the sides of ΔABC at the points where the incircle meets the sides are concurrent (at the incenter.)

    Obvious.

  4. The perpendiculars to the sides of ΔABC at the points where the excircles meet the sides are concurrent.

    Indeed [F. G.-M., p. 555], in this case we have

    CA' = AC', BA' = AB', and BC' = CB',

    which implies (1).

  5. Existence of Orthopole

    To every line m in the plane of ΔABC there correspond a point - the orthopole of M with respect to ΔABC. To define the point, first drop perpendiculars AL, BM and CN from the vertices of ΔABC onto m. From the three points thus obtained drop perpendiculars on the "opposite" sides of the triangle: from L onto BC, from M onto AC, and from N onto AB. The latter three lines are concurrent, and the point where they meet is known as the orthopole of m with repsect to ΔABC.

    Darij Grinberg came up with an ingenious proof of this result based on Carnot's theorem (1). As we already know, the points A', B', C' need not be located on the sides of ΔABC. So let's take A' = L, B' = M, and C' = N. Applying the Pythagorean theorem several times, we obtain

    AM² - LM² = AL² = AN² - LN²,

    so that

    AM² - AN² = LM² - LN².

    Similarly,

    BN² - BL² = MN² - LM², and
    CL² - CM² = LN² - MN²,

    which, when added, produce

    AM² - AN² + BN² - BL² + CL² - CM = 0.

References

  1. F. G.-M., Exercices de Géométrie, Éditions Jacques Gabay, sixiéme édition, 1991

|Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Geometry| |Store|

Copyright © 1996-2012 Alexander Bogomolny

 40615363

A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help
Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic
Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Old and nice bookstore
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK
Supported by
3wVentures