Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Carnot's Theorem

Carnot's theorem is a direct application of the theorem of Pythagoras. It's a nice little theorem that is unlikely to be rediscovered with dynamic geometry software. A penchant for doodling and imagination this is all that is probably needed to rediscover a theorem like that.

Let points A', B', and C' be located on the sides BC, AC, and respectively AB of ABC. The perpendiculars to the sides of the triangle at points A', B', and C' are concurrent iff

(1) AC'2 - BC'2 + BA'2 - CA'2 + CB'2 - AB'2 = 0.

Proof

Assume the three perpendiculars meet in point P. The lines AP, BP, CP, A'P, B'P, C'P split the triangle into six right-angled triangles, three pairs of which share a hypotenuse, whilst three other pairs share a leg with a vertex at P. The situation begs for an application of the Pythagorean theorem:

  AC'2 + C'P2 = AP2
BC'2 + C'P2 = BP2
BA'2 + A'P2 = BP2
CA'2 + A'P2 = CP2
CB'2 + B'P2 = CP2
AB'2 + B'P2 = AP2.

Taking the first, third, and fifth equations with the sign "+", and the second, fourth, and sixth equations with the sign "-", and adding up all six leads, after obvious simplifications, to (1).

To proof the converse, assume (1) and let P be the point of intersection of, say, A'P and B'P. Drop a perpendicular DP from P to AB. By the already proven part:

  AD2 - BD2 + BA'2 - CA'2 + CB'2 - AB2 = 0,

so that

(2) AD2 - BD2 = AC'2 - BC'2.

This is only possible if D = C'. Why so. Let BD = x, AB = c. Then AD = c - x, and

  AD2 - BD2 = (c - x)2 - x2 = c2 - 2cx,

which is a linear function of x: f(x) = c2 - 2cx. f therefore is 1-1. In other words, f(x) can't have the same value for two different x's. This means that (2) does imply D = C'.

We are naturally coming to a related problem: Given two points A and B. What is the locus of points M such that AM2 - BM2 is constant?

Let M be a point on the locus and H the foot of the perpendicular from M to AB. By the Pythagorean theorem:

  AM2 - AH2 = MH2 = BM2 - BH2,

i.e.,

  AM2 - BM2 = AH2 - BH2,

which means that, if M lies on the locus in question, so does H. And vice versa. Since the same H serves as the foot of the perpendicular MH for all points M of the line perpendicular to AB at H, this line solves the problem.

If we place the origin of a Cartesian coordinates system at B with the x-axis along AB and the y-axis perpendicular to it, we may assign coordinates (x, y) to point M. Then

  BM2 = x2 + y2, whereas
AM2 = (c - x)2 + y2.

Thus, as above,

  AM2 - BM2 = (c - x)2 + y2 - x2 - y2 = f(x),

where f(x) is the function defined above. If x is fixed, so is f(x), and also AM2 - BM2, as expected. From this fact, or from the underlying proof, it is clear that, for (1) to hold, the points A', B' C' need not be necessarily located on the sides of ABC.

Corollary

  1. Perpendicular bisectors of the sides of a triangle concur in a point (the circumcenter.)

    Indeed, AC' = BC', BA' = CA', and CB' = AB' imply (1).

  2. The altitudes of a triangle concur in a point.

    Indeed, if AA', BB', and CC' are altitudes of ABC, then

      AB2 - BA'2 = AA'2 = AC2 - CA'2,

    so that

      AB2 - AC2 = BA'2 - CA'2,

    Similarly,

      AC2 - BC2 = AC'2 - BC'2 and
    BC2 - AB2 = CB'2 - AB'2, which,

    when added, give (1).

  3. The perpendiculars to the sides of ABC at the points where the incircle meets the sides are concurrent (at the incenter.)

    Obvious.

  4. The perpendiculars to the sides of ABC at the points where the excircles meet the sides are concurrent.

    Indeed [F. G.-M., p. 555], in this case we have

      CA' = AC', BA' = AB', and BC' = CB',

    which implies (1).

  5. Existence of Orthopole

    To every line m in the plane of ABC there correspond a point - the orthopole of M with respect to ABC. To define the point, first drop perpendiculars AL, BM and CN from the vertices of ABC onto m. From the three points thus obtained drop perpendiculars on the "opposite" sides of the triangle: from L onto BC, from M onto AC, and from N onto AB. The latter three lines are concurrent, and the point where they meet is known as the orthopole of m with repsect to ABC.

    Darij Grinberg came up with an ingenious proof of this result based on Carnot's theorem (1). As we already know, the points A', B', C' need not be located on the sides of ABC. So let's take A' = L, B' = M, and C' = N. Applying the Pythagorean theorem several times, we obtain

      AM2 - LM2 = AL2 = AN2 - LN2,

    so that

      AM2 - AN2 = LM2 - LN2.

    Similarly,

      BN2 - BL2 = MN2 - LM2, and
    CL2 - CM2 = LN2 - MN2,

    which, when added, produce

      AM2 - AN2 + BN2 - BL2 + CL2 - CM2 = 0.

References

  1. F. G.-M., Exercices de Géométrie, Éditions Jacques Gabay, sixiéme édition, 1991

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

28777554Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
Math
Posted by Laura
2 messages
06:56 AM, Apr-15-08

Divisibility rules - Jargon buste ...
Posted by Carolyn
2 messages
08:35 AM, Apr-04-08

drawing puzzle
Posted by martin gran
31 messages
06:53 PM, May-09-08

conway's game of life
Posted by frequency
0 messages
11:52 PM, May-12-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

Need details on a part of Proof o ...
Posted by Manuel S.
2 messages
05:24 PM, May-16-08

Josephus Flavius (correction)
Posted by David Turner
1 messages
09:42 AM, May-14-08