Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Mathematics Education: Taking a Clue
From the Recent Technological Revolution

Is mathematics object oriented?

We already saw that a class hierarchy came in handy for problem solving. Additional examples will show that object orientation has significance in mathematics.

  1. Mathematics distinguishes between the abstract and the concrete.

    There is the Pythagorean Theorem and a Pythagorean triple 32 + 42 = 52

  2. Mathematics has hierarchy and inheritance

    Everything that holds in a superclass is inherited by a subclass

  3. Mathematics has polymorphism

    Drawing a line depends on the geometry at hand.

  4. Encapsultion

    It's easy to see that encapsulation makes mathematics human. Whitehead and Russell aside, do mathematicians care to see proofs that start with axioms?

    Encapsulation along with abstraction (conceptualization) make mathematics pluggable. (It is pluggable - there is no question about that.)

So, what do you think?

We may also note that mathematics has an inside and an outside. Paraphrasing E.T.Bell who said "The place of rigor in mathematics is in mathematics." (The Place of Rigor in Mathematics (Monthly (41)1934)), I can say that the inside of mathematics is mathematics. The outside of mathematics is not mathematics.

So, what is outside of mathematics? I say: objects without classes.

I.Kant said

A concept without a percept is empty
a percept without a concept is blind.

2 + 3 = 5 in itself is just a fact which one may believe in, be sure of, or even know for sure. Memorization, gadget manipulation without conceptualization is blind - not pluggable, and is not mathematics.

And, of course, if there is no proofs, there may hardly be mathematics. Sorry, can't talk of anything and not mention its unique features.

I would also like to say that mathematics is not dull and, therefore, anything dull is not mathematics. This sounds so uplifting. But enthusiasm devoid of tangible manifistation is grotesque, not just empty. Mathematics is not dull for those who do it. Technolgy has a potential to make mathematics not dull for those who learn it. Technology has a potential to make the invisible visible. It also shows the way how to do that.

Index|| Examples| Is Mathematics OO?| Problem posing

28739306Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
Math
Posted by Laura
2 messages
06:56 AM, Apr-15-08

Divisibility rules - Jargon buste ...
Posted by Carolyn
2 messages
08:35 AM, Apr-04-08

drawing puzzle
Posted by martin gran
31 messages
06:53 PM, May-09-08

conway's game of life
Posted by frequency
0 messages
11:52 PM, May-12-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

Deriving functions based on diffe ...
Posted by ke_45
1 messages
12:47 PM, May-10-08

Josephus Flavius (correction)
Posted by David Turner
1 messages
09:42 AM, May-14-08