Hiroshi Haruki's Lemma: What is this about?
A Mathematical Droodle


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

Explanation

|Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Geometry| |Store|

Copyright © 1996-2015 Alexander Bogomolny

The applet may suggest the following assertion:

Assume AB and CD are two chords and P a point on a circle. Let Q and R be the intersections of PC and PD with AB. Draw circumcircles of triangles PRC and PQD and let AB intersect the two circles in F and E, respectively. Then

(1) BE = AF, and their length does not depend on the position of P on the given circle.

The latter is an unintended consequence of the proof of Hiroshi Haruki's Lemma [Honsberger]:

(2) For AB, CD, P, Q, R as above, AQ·RB / QR does not depend on the position of P on the given circle.

Proof


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

In the circumcircle PQD, if P lies in the major arc CD, the angles QPD and QED are equal as subtending the same chord QD. As P traverses the major arc CD , the angle at E (AED) remains the same, which means that the point E remains fixed. (This is in fact true even if P lies on the minor arc CD.) So that BE = const, independent of the position of P on the circle.

We apply the intersecting Chords Theorem to PD crossed by AE in two circles:

  PR·RD = QR·RE and PR·RD = AR·RB,

from which

  QR·(RB + BE) = (AQ + QR)·RB,

or QR·BE = AQ·RB, and finally

(3) AQ·RB / QR = BE.

This proves (2) and also (1), since a similar argument in the circle PRC shows that F is independent of P and, in addition, AF = AQ·RB / QR, the same expression as in (3).

The lemma leads to elegant proofs of the Butterfly and Two Butterflies theorems.

References

  1. R. Honsberger, The Butterfly Problem and Other Delicacies from the Noble Art of Euclidean Geometry I, TYCMJ, 14 (1983), pp. 2-7.
  2. R. Honsberger, Mathematical Diamonds, MAA, 2003, pp. 136-140

|Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Geometry| |Store|

Copyright © 1996-2015 Alexander Bogomolny

 49551928

Google
Web CTK