# Increasing or decreasing subsequence

Given any sequence of mn+1 real numbers, some subsequence of (m+1) numbers is increasing or some subsequence of (n+1) numbers is decreasing.

Solution

|Contact|
|Front page|
|Contents|
|Up|

Copyright © 1966-2016 Alexander Bogomolny
Given any sequence of mn+1 real numbers, some subsequence of (m+1) numbers is increasing or some subsequence of (n+1) numbers is decreasing.

Assume that the result is false. For each number x in the sequence, form the ordered pair (i, j), where i is the length of the longest increasing subsequence beginning with x, and j is the length of the longest decreasing subsequence ending with x. Then, since the result is false, 1 ≤ i ≤ m and 1 ≤ j ≤ n. Thus we have mn + 1 ordered pairs, of which at most mn are distinct. Hence two members of the sequence, say a and b, are associated with the same ordered pair (s, t). Without loss of generality we may assume that a precedes b in the sequence.

If a < b, then a, together with the longest increasing subsequence beginning with b, is an increasing subsequence of length (s + 1), contradicting the fact that s is the length of the longest increasing subsequence beginning with a. Hence a ≥ b. But then, b, together with the longest decreasing subsequence ending with a, is a subsequence of length (t + 1), contradicting that the longest decreasing subsequence ending with b is of length t. There is no way out; our assumption is false, and the result is therefore true.

(There is an interactive illustration of the above result and another one, perhaps a little more entertaining. According to Erickson, the problem is now known as the *Erdös-Szekeres* theorem.

### References

- M. Aigner, G. Ziegler,
*Proofs from THE BOOK*, Springer, 2000
- A. Engel,
*Problem-Solving Strategies*, Springer Verlag, 1998, p. 61
- M. Erickson,
*Beautiful Mathematics*, MAA, 2011
- M. Gardner,
*The Last Recreations*, Copernicus, 1997

|Contact|
|Front page|
|Contents|
|Up|

Copyright © 1966-2016 Alexander Bogomolny