Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Addition of Numbers

Since there many different kinds of numbers there are different kinds of additions. For every set of numbers we have to define an operation that satisfies the axioms of addition.

We have to start somewhere, and I shall assume that we know how to add (and subtract, actually also multiply) integers Z = {...,-2, -1, 0, 1, 2, ...}. But note that it's possible to derive all the properties of integer addition from a more basic, unary operation of passing to the next integer. The axioms for the next operation are known as the axioms of Peano (Giuseppe, 1858-1932). It's the same Peano who invented the space filling curves.

For rational numbers, addition is defined with

p/q+r/s=(ps+rq)/(qs)

and we can verify that this operation satisfies axioms 1-4. First of all, recollect that representation p/q and (np)/(nq) define the same rational number. Consider then the number 0/q. By definition, 0/q+r/s=(rq)/(qs)=r/s. Similarly, r/s+0/q=r/s. So that 0/q takes the role of zero. It's next shown that numbers p/1 can be identified with integers. Therefore, there is no confusion between the "integer" and "rational" zeros. They are one and the same number. Associativity and commutativity are verified in a straightforward manner.

For real numbers addition can be extended "by continuity" which is not difficult but will sway us from the topic unnecessarily. Perhaps I'll return to this at a later date.


Complex numbers are pairs (x,y) of real numbers. Addition is defined componentwise:

(x1,y1)+(x2,y2)=(x1+y1,x2+y2)

With this definition (x,y)+(0,0)=(0,0)+(x,y)=(x,y) so that (0,0) takes the role of zero. Since real numbers x can be identified with pairs (x,0) there again couldn't possibly arise confusion between the "rational" and "complex" zeros. Both are denoted 0. Associativity (commutativity) of the complex addition is implied by associativity (commutativity) of the real addition. For example,

(x1,y1)+(x2,y2)=(x1+y1,x2+y2)=(x2+y2,x1+y1)=(x2,y2)+(x1,y1)

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

28695969Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
Math
Posted by Laura
2 messages
06:56 AM, Apr-15-08

Divisibility rules - Jargon buste ...
Posted by Carolyn
2 messages
08:35 AM, Apr-04-08

drawing puzzle
Posted by martin gran
31 messages
06:53 PM, May-09-08

Distance to the horizon
Posted by Monty
3 messages
04:38 PM, May-08-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

Deriving functions based on diffe ...
Posted by ke_45
1 messages
12:47 PM, May-10-08

A typo in
Posted by alexwajn
1 messages
11:36 PM, Apr-19-08