Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Math & English enrichment at SchoolPlus-Online
HoodaMath: games and movies
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Following is an excerpt from
J.H.Conway and R.K.Guy,
The Book of Numbers

DE MOIVRE’S CIRCLE-CUTTING NUMBERS

Go to Mr. De Moivre; he knows these things better than I do.

Isaac Newton

Draw a regular polygon, centered at the origin in the complex plane, with one comer being the number 1 (Figure 8.13). What are the complex numbers corresponding to all the comers? These numbers were studied by the English mathematician Abraham De Moivre (1667-1754) long before it was realized that they had a geometrical meaning.

When the polygon is a square (Figure 8.13(b)), the answer is easy. The numbers (reading counterclockwise) are 1, i, - 1, -i. We call these the fourth-order De Moivre numbers. In a similar way, the third-order De Moivre numbers (Figure 8.13(a)) are 1, (-1+ i3)/2, 1 - i3)/2, and the sixth-order ones are these and their negatives:

(again reading counterclockwise). The fifth-order ones are a bit harder: You have to solve one quadratic equation on top of another.

What can we say about these numbers? They are all powers of one of them! The De Moivre number that immediately follows 1 in counterclockwise order we'll call n (if the polygon has 1 coners), or just when 1 is obvious. Since the twirl that takes 1 to (Figure 8.13(c)) takes to 2, 2 to 3, and so on, we see that the full set of nth-order De Moivre numbers is

and we also see that n = 1. But we saw that 4 = i, which satisfies 2+1=0, So n=1 is not always the simplest equation satisfied by n. The following table gives the simplest equation for an for n = 1, . . . , 12.

In fact, the nth-order De Moivre number, n is an algebraic number whose degree is the nth of Euler's totient numbers, (n). The solutions of this equation are all the primitive nth roots of unity. They satisfy xk=1 for k=n, but for no smaller values of k.

We said that 5 could be found by solving one quadratic on top of another. In fact,

as you can see by writing the equation 4+3+2++1=0 in the form (2+/2+1)2=(5)2/4.

THE ONLY RATIONAL TRIANGLE

Suppose you have a triangle all of whose sides are rational numbers and all of whose angles are rational numbers of degrees. Then it must be equilateral! You might think that this was a very deep result, but in fact it's surprisingly easy to verify it, using De Moivre's numbers. Put your triangle in the complex plane (Figure 8.14). Then the angles indicated will be p nths and q nths of a revolution, where we take the smallest possible value of n. Since the three indicated shifts add up to zero, we see that the nth-order De Moivre number = n must satisfy

as, therefore, must all the algebraic conjugates of n that have the form k whenever k and n have no common factor.

So indeed we have (n) equations

and so (n) different triangles, such as in Figure 8.15, all of which have the same base and the same edge lengths, but different angles. This is nonsense, because there can be at most two such triangles: the original one (Figure 8.14) and its reflection in the base (the two rightmost in Figure 8.15). Now the only numbers with (n) 2 are n=1,2,3,4, or 6, so all angles are at least 1/6 of a revolution (i.e., 60o), and your triangle must be equilateral, since its angles add up to 180o.

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

33068227Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK