xx3 = 3
Here's a problem. Let f(x) = xx3. Obviously, f(1) = 1 and f grows with x without bound. It follows that the equation
has a solution greater than 1. Find at least one such solution.
![]()
|Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Algebra| |Math induction| |Store|
Copyright © 1996-2012 Alexander BogomolnyWe are only concerned with positive x. Introduce y = x3, then xy = 3. Take the logarithm of both sides of both equations:
ln(y) = 3·ln(x)
y·ln(x) = ln(3),
which simplifies to
y·ln(y) = 3·ln(3).
The latter equation is trivially solved by y = 3. (We may observe in passing that the equation has no other real solutions. Indeed, the function
Therefore, 3 = x3, and x = 31/3.
Well, we got one solution to the equation xx3 = 3 and may consider the problem solved and the case closed. However, I was quite surprised to arrive at that solution. For, note that the value
x3 = 3, and
xx3 = 3.
Will it also solve xxx3 = 3? Yes, of course. Since
Having made the first step, why not to continue? We can substitute x3 for the exponent 3 in the new equation, to obtain
Let's define
with n occurrences of x, so that
(While many graphics program are capable of generating such graphs, the diagram above was produced by DPGraph 2000, a program written and distributed by David Parker. DPGraph 2000 shines in 3D. It generates surfaces with the same ease as curves. All it takes is to write the surface equation. The program is available to download for the nominal price of $1.99. My 6 months old son is absolutely enchanted with those 3D shapes and the speed with which the program manipulates them.)
The next logical step is to replace 3 with an arbitrary parameter a. For positive a, define
with n x's and consider the equation
We see that, for all n,
s1 = x, s2 = xx, s3 = xxx, ...
has a limit. If it does, the infinite exponent xxx... is declared to equal this limit. For 1 < x < e1/e the limit in fact exists, and this is how we prove that.
The sequence {sn} is monotone increasing and is bounded from above. (It's a well known fact that bounded monotone sequences have a limit.) Indeed, since
s2 = xs1 > x1 = s1
and more generally, by induction,
sn+1 = xsn > xsn-1 = sn.
The sequence {sn} is also bounded from above. To see that, first of all observe that if
then x and y are either both greater or both less than 1. If they are greater than 1 then
sn+1 = xsn < xy = y.
We conclude that sequence {sn} has a limit, say, A which, by necessity, satisfies
It is important to note that A may be different from y! In fact the function f(z) = z1/z is defined for all positive z, has a maximum at

This means that, for 1 < x < e1/e, the equation
The sequence {sn} results if one attempts to solve (1) by an iterative procedure.
where g(s) = xs. The derivative
g'(s) = ln(x)·xs = ln(x)·g(s).
If x and s are related via (1), then
References
- P. Winkler, Mathematical Puzzles: A Connoisseur's Collection, A K Peters, 2004
![]()
|Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Generalizations| |Algebra| |Math induction| |Store|
Copyright © 1996-2012 Alexander Bogomolny| 40608053 |

