Problem 1 from the IMO 2009

Here is Problem 1 from the IMO 2009:

  Let n be a positive integer and let a1, ..., ak (k ≥ 2) be distinct integers in the set {1, ..., n} such that n divides ai(ai+1 - 1) for i = 1, ..., k - 1. Prove that n does not divide ak(a1 - 1).

Solution

|Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Algebra| |Store|

Copyright © 1996-2012 Alexander Bogomolny

Set for simplicity a = a1 and b = a2, ab and both are less than n.

Thus n|a(b - 1) meaning that there are s and t, st = n, such that s|a and t|(b - 1). Since both a and b are less than n, neither s or t may equal 1, meaning that both are non-trivial factors of n.

Let first k = 2, and assume that n|b(a - 1). No non-trivial factor of t may divide b, and no non-trivial factor of s may divide a - 1, implying that s|b. We are therefore in a position to apply the Chinese Remainder Theorem:

(1)
b= 1 (mod t),
b= 0 (mod s).

The theorem tells us that there is a unique solution modulo lcd(s, t) = n. However, due to the symmetry in the conditions for a and b, we also have

 a= 1 (mod t),
 a= 0 (mod s),

which contradicts the assumption that a and b are different.

For k = 3, we are given that n|b(c - 1) where c = a3. Assume, as before, n|c(a - 1).

There are s and t different from 1 and n such that s|a and t|(b - 1). No non-trivial factor of t may divide b. From n|b(c - 1) it then follows that t|(c - 1). If not s itself, then one of its factors, say, s0 divides b: s0|b, s1t|(c - 1), where s = s0s1.

Similarly, n|c(a - 1) implies that σ0|c and σ1s1t|(a - 1), where σ0σ1 = s0. It's now one of the two, either σ1s1 = 1 or not. In the former case, the Chinese Remainder theorem leads to a contradiction. In the latter case, there appears a non-trivial factor common to both a and and a - 1. Again a contradiction.

For greater k, we always have t|ai+1 - 1. As we progress from 1 to larger i, additional factors may be borrowed from s. If this happens, then a and a - 1 will have shown to have common factors. Otherwise a contradiction is reached via the Chinese Remainder theorem.

A shorter and a more formal solution was posted at the artofproblemsolving.com forum by mathman145.

We know that n divides ai(ai + 1 - 1), i = 1, ..., k - 1. The condition is equivalent to saying that

 akak - 1 = ak - 1 (mod n),
 akak - 1ak - 2 = ak - 1ak - 2 = ak - 2 (mod n),
 akak - 1ak - 2ak - 3 = ak - 1ak - 2ak - 3 = ak - 2ak - 3 = ak - 3 (mod n) ...

so that

 akak - 1ak - 2ak - 3 ... a1 = a1 (mod n).

Now assume that ak(a1 - 1) is divisible by n. Then, similarly to the above

 a1akak - 1ak - 2ak - 3 ... a2 = a2 (mod n),

implying that a1 = a2 (mod n) which is impossible for two distinct positive integers both less than n.

|Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Algebra| |Store|

Copyright © 1996-2012 Alexander Bogomolny

 41162451

A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help
Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic
Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Old and nice bookstore
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK
Supported by
3wVentures