Three Isosceles Triangles: What Is It About?
A Mathematical Droodle


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

Explanation

|Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Geometry| |Store|

Copyright © 1996-2012 Alexander Bogomolny

Three Isosceles Triangles

The applet suggests the following theorem [Honsberger, p. 271]:

Suppose A, B, C are arbitrary points on a straight line, and α is a given angle. Assume also that similarly oriented isosceles triangles ABX and BCY have the same apex angles α at X and Y. If XYZ is an isosceles triangle with the apex angle at Z equal to α, but having orientation opposite to that of triangles ABX and BCY, then Z is always collinear with A, B, and C!


This applet requires Sun's Java VM 2 which your browser may perceive as a popup. Which it is not. If you want to see the applet work, visit Sun's website at http://www.java.com/en/download/index.jsp, download and install Java VM and enjoy the applet.


Buy this applet
What if applet does not run?

One simple solution makes use of the properties of complex numbers and their geometric interpretation. Thus I shall interpret all vertices and points of intersection as complex numbers in the plane of the diagram with an arbitrarily chosen origin.

Point X - the apex of an isosceles triangle ABX - is uniquely defined by the pair A, B, the orientation of the triangle and the angle α. It could be expressed as a complex linear combination of A and B:

(1) X = (1 - c)A + cB,

where c = 1/2 + k·i, i2 = -1, and k being a real number. The real part of c is bound to equal 1/2 in order for the triangle ABX to be isosceles. By the construction,

(2) Y = (1 - c)B + cC,

and also

(3) Z = (1 - c)Y + cX,

Substituting (1)-(2) into (3) gives:

(4) Z = c(1 - c)A + (c2 + (1-c)2)B + c(1 - c)C.

Now,

  c(1 - c) = (1/2 + k·i)(1/2 - k·i) = 1/4 + k2,

while

 
c2 + (1-c)2 = (1/2 + k·i)2 + (1/2 - k·i)2
  = 1/2 - 2k2.

So, in fact, the linear combination (4) is real, i.e. having all real coefficients. Moreover, the three coefficients in (4) add up to 1. This exactly means that Z (the value of the combination) is collinear with A, B, and C.

Remark

It must be noted that the fact that (4) is real is independent of the requirement that the real part Re(c) of c equals 1/2. Which implies that the theorem remains valid if isosceles triangles are replaced with similar ones. Such a generalization has been suggested by Nathan Bowler who also supplied a very simple synthetic proof of the latter (and hence of the current theorem.) Nathan also came up with further generalization wherewith the third triangle is formed for any point X' on BX and any point Y' on BY. The apex Z' of such triangles is still collinear with A, B, and C.

References

  1. Honsberger, In Pólya's Footsteps, MAA, 1999

|Activities| |Contact| |Front page| |Contents| |Geometry| |Store|

Copyright © 1996-2012 Alexander Bogomolny

 40611973

A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help
Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic
Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Old and nice bookstore
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK
Supported by
3wVentures