Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Morley's Miracle
Remarks on J.Conway's proof

As other "backward" proofs, Conway's ends up with a triangle that at best is similar to ABC which is of course fine.

The seven triangles fit together for two reasons:

  1. At the vertices of the equilateral triangle the angles sum up to 360o.
  2. The line segments that are to be common sides of two triangles are equal by construction. This is clear for the sides of the equilateral triangle that have been chosen to be 1. The add-on points Y and Z allow to select triangles BPC, AQC, and ARB so that the potential trisectors also match each other.

The whole point of introducing points Y and Z is to eschew trigonometry. Building on the rigidity of the configuration and the fact that all angles in all triangles are known, it is possible to follow the chain of six triangles (the middle one excluded) using the Law of Sines:

Start, for example with ABR. Fix, say, AR. Then

(1)BR = AR·sin(a)/sin(b).

Construct BPR with BR given above. Then

(2)BP = BR·sin(a*)/sin(c*).

Keep constructing triangles so that their sides match. By the Law of Sines, we'll sequentially get

(3)CP = BP·sin(b)/sin(c)
(4)CQ = CP·sin(b*)/sin(a*)
(5)AQ = CQ·sin(c)/sin(a)
(6)AR = AQ·sin(c*)/sin(b*)

The last one should actually read "AR' = AQ·sin(c*)/sin(b*)". For we do not know in advance whether it has the same length as AR. To see that it does, multiply (1)-(6): after reducing like factors we end up with AR' = AR. Therefore, putting together the six triangles fills a triangle with a triangular hole. Counting angles we see that the hole is equiangular. Which is what was needed.

One should appreciate the simplicity of Conway's proof that not only avoids the trigonometry but makes it also unnecessary to handle all 6 triangles separately. D.J.Newman's proof is a simplified trigonometric variant where only 3 (out of 6) triangles are handled with the Law of Sines.


Morley's Miracle

  1. J.Conway's proof
    • Remarks on J.Conway's proof
  2. D.J.Newman's proof
  3. Bankoff's proof
  4. Another proof
  5. Nikos Dergiades' proof
  6. G. Zsolt Kiss' proof
  7. M. T. Naraniengar's proof
  8. Doodling and Miracles
  9. Morley's Pursuit of Incidence
  10. Lines, Circles and Beyond
  11. On Motivation and Understanding
  12. Bankoff's Conundrum
  13. Morley's Redux and More, Alain Connes' proof
  14. An Unexpected Variant

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

28777578Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
Math
Posted by Laura
2 messages
06:56 AM, Apr-15-08

Divisibility rules - Jargon buste ...
Posted by Carolyn
2 messages
08:35 AM, Apr-04-08

drawing puzzle
Posted by martin gran
31 messages
06:53 PM, May-09-08

conway's game of life
Posted by frequency
0 messages
11:52 PM, May-12-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

Need details on a part of Proof o ...
Posted by Manuel S.
2 messages
05:24 PM, May-16-08

Josephus Flavius (correction)
Posted by David Turner
1 messages
09:42 AM, May-14-08