Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Learning Math Online
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

Morley's Miracle: An Unexpected Variant

Subject:Morley's theorem
Date:Jul-16-03
From:Larry Hammick
 

Hi,

Since CTK has such a good account of Morley's theorem, I thought I would point out this little sidelight on it:

http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/CorollaryOfMorleysTheorem.html

Larry
Vancouver

Larry, thank you. I find it indeed amazing and think that F. Morley himself have not foreseen this variant.

One of the vertices of ABC, say C, is pushed off to infinity so that the two sides AC and BC and the trisector lines at C become parallel. In this case the angles at A and B are supplementary:

(1) A + B = 180o

As will be demonstrated below, in order that the "Morley triangle" be equilateral, the four lines need be equidistant.

 

I'll follow D. J. Newman's proof, but use J. Conway's notations.

We backtrack, i.e. start with an equilateral triangle PQR of side 1 and errect two triangles, AQR and BPR, with angles a, and 60o, b* and, respectively, b, 60o, and a*. As in the original proof, angle RAB is shown to be A, while angle RBA is shown to be b.

We now draw four parallel lines through the points B, P, Q, A, such that the added angle at vertex A is a and that at B is b. This is possible because of (1). Counting angles around P and Q we immediately get PQ = a* while QP = b*. (It is of course possible to draw lines at the indicated angles and prove them parallel afterwards. This would be closer to Newman's proof.)

Now the only thing that remains to be proven is the fact that the four lines are equidistant.

From the Law of Sines in AQR,

  AQ = sin(b*)/sin(a).

Therefore, if QT AT, then QT = AQ·sin(a). Which gives QT = sin(b*). Similarly, BP = sin(a*)/sin(b) and PS = sin(a*), where PS BS. However, from (1), a* + b* = 180o. We thus have

  QT = PS.

Let QU PU. Then QU = sin(b*), too. And all three distances coincide:

  QT = PS = QU.

Morley's Miracle

  1. J.Conway's proof
  2. D. J. Newman's proof
  3. Bankoff's proof
  4. B. Bollobás' proof
  5. Another proof
  6. Nikos Dergiades' proof
  7. G. Zsolt Kiss' proof
  8. M. T. Naraniengar's proof
  9. Doodling and Miracles
  10. Morley's Pursuit of Incidence
  11. Lines, Circles and Beyond
  12. On Motivation and Understanding
  13. Bankoff's conundrum
  14. Of Looking and Seeing
  15. Morley's Redux and More, Alain Connes' proof
  16. An Unexpected Variant
  17. Proof by B. Stonebridge and B. Millar
  18. Proof by B. Stonebridge
  19. Proof by Nolan L Aljaddou
  20. Proof by Roger Smyth

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

34219876Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK