Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Learning Math Online
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

Gergonne and Van Obel theorems

Ceva's theorem is a fundamental result in Triangle Geometry that relates ratios of segments cut by the concurrent cevians on the sides of a triangle. A less known result valid in the same configuration has been proved by Van Obel and bears his name. A related theorem discovered by Gergonne is virtually unknown. The latter two have simple proofs based on three observations:

  1. The area of a triangle with a fixed base and varying apex changes in proportion to its altitude.

  2. As a consequence of 1, if two triangles share an altitude and the base line, then their areas are in proportion to their bases.

  3. a/b = c/d is equivalent to a/b = (a ± c)/(b ± d), unless of course a = c and b = d.

Based on the above, I shall prove the two theorems, Gergonne's coming first:

Theorem (Gergonne, 1818)

Let three cevians AD, BE, and CF concur at a point K inside ABC. Then

(1) KD/AD + KE/BE + KF/CF = 1

and also

(2) AK/AD + BK/BE + CK/CF = 2

Proof

Since, for example, AK/AD + KD/AD = 1, (1) and (2) are clearly equivalent. So let's prove (1).

By , Area(BKC)/Area(ABC) = KD/AD, Area(AKC)/Area(ABC) = KE/BE, Area(AKB)/Area(ABC) = KE/CE, which, when added up, yield

  KD/AD + KE/BE + KF/CF = (Area(BKC) + Area(AKC) + Area(AKB))/Area(ABC) = 1.

The proof of Van Obel's theorem takes a little longer.

Theorem (Van Obel)

AK/KD = AF/FB + AE/EC.

Proof

By 2, Area(AKB)/Area(BKD) = AK/KD = Area(AKC)/Area(CKD). By 3,

(3)AK/KD = Area(AKB)/Area(BKD) + Area(AKC)/Area(CKD)
   = (Area(AKB) + Area(AKC))/(Area(BKD) + Area(CKD))
   = (Area(AKB) + Area(AKC))/Area(BKC)
   = Area(AKB)/Area(BKC) + Area(AKC)/Area(BKC).

On the other hand, again by 2,

 Area(ABE)/Area(BCE) = AE/EC = Area(AKE)/Area(CKE).

From here, (Area(ABE) - Area(AKE))/(Area(BCE) - Area(CKE)) = AE/EC. So that

(4)Area(AKB)/Area(BKC) = AE/EC.

Similarly, Area(AKC)/Area(BKC) = AF/FB. And the theorem follows.

(4) and its analogues furnish an extra proof of Ceva's theorem. Indeed

 AE/EC = Area(AKB)/Area(BKC),
 CD/DB = Area(AKC)/Area(AKB),
 BF/FA = Area(BKC)/Area(AKC),

which after multiplication give Ceva's identity.

Remark

As with barycentric coordinates, if the point K lies outside ABC, the areas of one or two of the triangles AKB, BKC, AKC may be regarded negative, in which case all three theorems still hold provided the segments involved are also considered signed.

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

34221613Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK