Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Learn to enjoy mathematics.
Google
Web CTK
Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards

Interactive Activities
CTK Exchange
CTK Insights - a blog

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Reciprocal links
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Best sites for teachers
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto: what CTK is about Search CTK Buying a book is a commitment to learning Table of content Things you can find on CTK Chronology of updates Email to Cut The Knot Recommend this page

Gergonne and Van Obel theorems

Ceva's theorem is a fundamental result in Triangle Geometry that relates ratios of segments cut by the concurrent cevians on the sides of a triangle. A less known result valid in the same configuration has been proved by Van Obel and bears his name. A related theorem discovered by Gergonne is virtually unknown. The latter two have simple proofs based on three observations:

  1. The area of a triangle with a fixed base and varying apex changes in proportion to its altitude.

  2. As a consequence of 1, if two triangles share an altitude and the base line, then their areas are in proportion to their bases.

  3. a/b = c/d is equivalent to a/b = (a ± c)/(b ± d), unless of course a = c and b = d.

Based on the above, I shall prove the two theorems, Gergonne's coming first:

Theorem (Gergonne, 1818)

Let three cevians AD, BE, and CF concur at a point K inside ABC. Then

(1) KD/AD + KE/BE + KF/CF = 1

and also

(2) AK/AD + BK/BE + CK/CF = 2

Proof

Since, for example, AK/AD + KD/AD = 1, (1) and (2) are clearly equivalent. So let's prove (1).

By , Area(BKC)/Area(ABC) = KD/AD, Area(AKC)/Area(ABC) = KE/BE, Area(AKB)/Area(ABC) = KE/CE, which, when added up, yield

  KD/AD + KE/BE + KF/CF = (Area(BKC) + Area(AKC) + Area(AKB))/Area(ABC) = 1.

The proof of Van Obel's theorem takes a little longer.

Theorem (Van Obel)

AK/KD = AF/FB + AE/EC.

Proof

By 2, Area(AKB)/Area(BKD) = AK/KD = Area(AKC)/Area(CKD). By 3,

(3)AK/KD = Area(AKB)/Area(BKD) + Area(AKC)/Area(CKD)
   = (Area(AKB) + Area(AKC))/(Area(BKD) + Area(CKD))
   = (Area(AKB) + Area(AKC))/Area(BKC)
   = Area(AKB)/Area(BKC) + Area(AKC)/Area(BKC).

On the other hand, again by 2,

 Area(ABE)/Area(BCE) = AE/EC = Area(AKE)/Area(CKE).

From here, (Area(ABE) - Area(AKE))/(Area(BCE) - Area(CKE)) = AE/EC. So that

(4)Area(AKB)/Area(BKC) = AE/EC.

Similarly, Area(AKC)/Area(BKC) = AF/FB. And the theorem follows.

(4) and its analogues furnish an extra proof of Ceva's theorem. Indeed

 AE/EC = Area(AKB)/Area(BKC),
 CD/DB = Area(AKC)/Area(AKB),
 BF/FA = Area(BKC)/Area(AKC),

which after multiplication give Ceva's identity.

Remark

As with barycentric coordinates, if the point K lies outside ABC, the areas of one or two of the triangles AKB, BKC, AKC may be regarded negative, in which case all three theorems still hold provided the segments involved are also considered signed.

Copyright © 1996-2008 Alexander Bogomolny

28695659Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:


Latest on CTK Exchange
Math
Posted by Laura
2 messages
06:56 AM, Apr-15-08

Divisibility rules - Jargon buste ...
Posted by Carolyn
2 messages
08:35 AM, Apr-04-08

drawing puzzle
Posted by martin gran
31 messages
06:53 PM, May-09-08

Distance to the horizon
Posted by Monty
3 messages
04:38 PM, May-08-08

Mistake on the page (an aside, Be ...
Posted by Max
4 messages
10:28 AM, Feb-28-08

Deriving functions based on diffe ...
Posted by ke_45
1 messages
12:47 PM, May-10-08

A typo in
Posted by alexwajn
1 messages
11:36 PM, Apr-19-08