Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Learning Math Online
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic
Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

Trigonometric Proof of the Pythagorean Theorem

Elisha Loomis, myself and no doubt many others believed and still believe that no trigonometric proof of the Pythagorean theorem is possible. This belief stems from the assumption that any such proof would rely on the most fundamental of trigonometric identities sin²α + cos²α = 1 which is nothing but a reformulation of the Pythagorean theorem proper. Thus, as the common argument goes, relying on it would lead inevitably to the vicious circle of circular reasoning. Now, Jason Zimba has showed that the theorem can be derived from the subtraction formulas for sine and cosine without a recourse to sin²α + cos²α = 1.

I happily admit to being in the wrong.

Here are the two subtraction formulas that J. Zimba employs in his derivation of the Pythagorean theorem:

  cos (α - β) = cos α cos β + sin α sin β, sin (α - β) = sin α cos β - cos α sin β.

Note that the common definitions of sine and cosine as well as the proofs of the two identities always restrict α and β to the positive values less than 90°. For this reason, simply setting α = β in the first of these leads to cos 0 = cos²α + sin²α. However, the fact that cos 0 = 1 is not a consequence of more basic trigonometry but a definition by convenience. As such, it could not be reasonably used in a proof of such a fundamental result as the Pythagorean theorem. Instead, assume that 0 < y < x < 90°. This makes 0 < x - y < 90°. Then

 cos y= cos (x - (x - y))
  = cos x cos(x - y) + sin x sin(x - y)
  = cos x (cos x cos y + sin x sin y) + sin x (sin x cos y - cos x sin y)
  = (cos²x + sin²x)cos y,

which implies sin²x + cos²x = 1 since, by the definition, cos y, being the ratio of a leg of a right triangle to its hypotenuse, is never zero. (As was already mentioned, the base definition of the trigonometric functions always assumes that the argument is a positive angle less than 90°.)

References

  1. E. S. Loomis, The Pythagorean Proposition, NCTM, 1968
  2. J. Zimba, On the Possibility of Trigonometric Proofs of the Pythagorean Theorem, Forum Geometricorum, Volume 9 (2009) 275-278

Copyright © 1996-2010 Alexander Bogomolny

35615105Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK