Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Learning Math Online
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic
Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

Shifting Digits and a Point of View

The number xn is defined as the last digit in the decimal representation of the integer ⌊(2)n⌋ (n = 1, 2, ...). Determine whether the sequence x1, x2, ..., xn, ... is periodic. [Savchev & Andreescu, p. 146].

(⌊a⌋ is the whole part of number a which is more often at this site and elsewhere denoted [x].)

Solution

Copyright © 1996-2010 Alexander Bogomolny

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Observe that

 y2n+1= (2)2n+1
  = (2)×2n.

Recollect that in the decimal system the multiplication of a real number by 10 causes the decimal point (or comma in some cultures) to shift one position to the right. The same happens in the binary system when a number is multiplied by 2. It follows that y2n+1 is a digit in the binary representation of 2 so that 0.y1y3y5... is the binary representation of the fractional part of 2. Since 2 is irrational, the sequence y1, y3, y5, ... is not periodic.

Let xn = zn (mod 2), where zn is either 0 or 1, n = 1, 2, ... Clearly, z2n+1 = y2n+1, and we just proved that the sequence {y2n+1} is not periodic. We may now claim that neither is {zn}. For if it were periodic with, say, period N, then it would be periodic with the period 2N as well. But this would imply that the sequence {y2n+1} had a period of N, which is impossible. Therefore, the sequence of remainders {zn} of the division of the terms {xn} by 2 is not periodic. Thus {xn} could not be periodic either.

References

  1. S. Savchev, T. Andreescu, Mathematical Miniatures, MAA, 2003

Copyright © 1996-2010 Alexander Bogomolny

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

35693604Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape

Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK