Prove that no seven distinct positive integers, not exceeding 24, can have sums of all subsets different.
Prove that no seven distinct positive integers, not exceeding 24, can have sums of all subsets different.
We shall show a stronger result: we shall confine the assertion at hand to the subsets of at most four elements. There are
C(7, 1) + C(7, 2) + C(7, 3) + C(7, 4) = 7 + 21 + 35 + 35 = 98
such subsets. On the other hand, the sum of four distinct integers not exceeding 24 is
24 + 23 + 22 + 21 = 90.
Thus there are 90 holes and 98 birds, implying that at least two of the subsets have the same sum.
Remark
Originally, the problem has been posted by Leo Moser in the American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 60, No. 10 (Dec., 1953), pp. 713-714, where the word "distinct" had been omitted but appeared to be assumed in the solution.
I have picked the problem from a combinatorics text, where the omission was detected and corrected.
It is strange, however, why the proposer chose to limit his numbers with 24 and not, say, with 25. The maximum sum in this case would be 94, allowing for a straightforward application of the pigeonhole principle.
The requirement of distinctiveness is however a necessary condition because, otherwise, some two 1-element sets would have equal sum of the elements.
But once the elements are said to be distinct, their upper bound can be upgraded to 25 or even 26! In the latter case, the maximum sum of a 4-set would be 98. Still the Pigeonhole is applicable. How? Why?
Solution 2
(This solution is due to Bernard Murphy)
Assume the numbers chosen are a < b < c < d < e < f < g.
The maximum sum of 6 chosen numbers is 24 + 23 + 22 + 21 + 20 + b = 110 + b and so the maximum sum which could be repeated is 109 + b.
The smallest possible sum which could be repeated is 1 + b since this could be equal to c.
Therefore there are at most 109 different totals but the number of subsets under consideration is 27 - 6 = 122 since each of {}, {a}, {b}, {b, c, d, e, f, g}, {a, c, d, e, f, g} and {a, b, c, d, e, f, g} cannot have the same sum as another set.
So there are 122 pigeons and only 109 pigeonholes.
Note: This solution leads to exactly same question, "Why the number of upper limit of the numbers in hand was chosen to be 24 and not 26?"
References
- W. D, Wallis, J. C. George, Introduction to Combinatorics, CRC, 2010, p. 49

|Contact|
|Front page|
|Contents|
|Up|
|Store|
Copyright © 1996-2012 Alexander Bogomolny