Cut the knot: learn to enjoy mathematics
A math books store at a unique math study site. Shopping at the store helps maintain the site. Thank you.
Learning Math Online
Sites for teachers
Sites for parents
Terms of use
Awards
Interactive Activities

CTK Exchange
CTK Wiki Math
CTK Insights - a blog
Math Help

III Millennium Olympiad

Games & Puzzles
What Is What
Arithmetic/Algebra
Geometry
Probability
Outline Mathematics
Make an Identity
Book Reviews
Stories for Young
Eye Opener
Analog Gadgets
Inventor's Paradox
Did you know?...
Proofs
Math as Language
Things Impossible
Visual Illusions
My Logo
Math Poll
Cut The Knot!
MSET99 Talk
Other Math sites
Front Page
Movie shortcuts
Personal info
Privacy Policy

Guest book
News sites

Recommend this site

Games to relax

Sites for teachers
Sites for parents

Education & Parenting

Manifesto  |  Bookstore  |  Contents  |  Amazon store  |  Term index  |  What changed?  |  Contact  |  Recommend
RSS Feed: Recent changes at CTK

The Right Way to Write Numeral 4

The following has been published in
Mathematics Magazine, Vol. 75, No. 4, October 2002, p. 274

or ? Mathematics or Accident?

ANA LUZÓN
MANUEL A. MORÓN
Depertmento de Matemática Aplicada a los Recursos Natureles
E. T. Superior de Ingenieros de Montes
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
28040-Madrid, SPAIN

Readers may be unaware of the relationship between divisibility properties of numbers and topological properties of the numerals used to represent them. Let us use the word number for both the concept and the numeral. Given a number n, a proper prime divisor of n is a prime number, different from n, that divides n evenly. Note the following:

THEOREM. Consider the set of numbers S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}. For a, b S the following are equivalent:

  1. a and b have the same number of proper prime divisors (counted with multiplicities).

  2. a and b have the same homotopy type.

  3. a and b cut a sheet in the same number of pieces if you write them down with a scalpel.

COROLLARY. A number in S (other than 1) is prime if and only if it has trivial homotopy type at equivalently, it does not tear the sheet in separate pieces.

We now answer the first question in our title:

COROLLARY. The correct symbol for the number four is , not .

Although the equivalence between (i) and (iii) in the theorem depends on Alexander-Pontryagin duality, this note, in spirit, belongs to the so called Shape Theory introduced by K. Borsuk. Readers may be interested to read Borsuk's book: Theory of Shape, Monografie Matematyczne, Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, 1975.

Language of Mathematics, Language of Science and Plain Language

Copyright © 1996-2009 Alexander Bogomolny

34219976Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape


Search:
Keywords:

Google
Web CTK